Abstract:The detection and diagnosis of caries at the initial (non‐cavitated) and moderate (enamel) levels of severity is fundamental to achieving and maintaining good oral health and prevention of oral diseases. An increasing array of methods of early caries detection have been proposed that could potentially support traditional methods of detection and diagnosis. Earlier identification of disease could afford patients the opportunity of less invasive treatment with less destruction of tooth tissue, reduce the need for treatment with aerosol‐generating procedures, and potentially result in a reduced cost of care to the patient and to healthcare services. To determine the diagnostic accuracy of different visual classification systems for the detection and diagnosis of non‐cavitated coronal dental caries for different purposes (detection and diagnosis) and in different populations (children or adults). Cochrane Oral Health's Information Specialist undertook a search of the following databases: MEDLINE Ovid (1946 to 30 April 2020); Embase Ovid (1980 to 30 April 2020); US National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register (ClinicalTrials.gov, to 30 April 2020); and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (to 30 April 2020). We studied reference lists as well as published systematic review articles. We included diagnostic accuracy study designs that compared a visual classification system (index test) with a reference standard (histology, excavation, radiographs). This included cross‐sectional studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of single index tests and studies that directly compared two or more index tests. Studies reporting at both the patient or tooth surface level were included. In vitro and in vivo studies were considered. Studies that explicitly recruited participants with caries into dentine or frank cavitation were excluded. We also excluded studies that artificially created carious lesions and those that used an index test during the excavation of dental caries to ascertain the optimum depth of excavation. We extracted data independently and in duplicate using a standardised data extraction and quality assessment form based on QUADAS‐2 specific to the review context. Estimates of diagnostic accuracy were determined using the bivariate hierarchical method to produce summary points of sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and regions, and 95% prediction regions. The comparative accuracy of different classification systems was conducted based on indirect comparisons. Potential sources of heterogeneity were pre‐specified and explored visually and more formally through meta‐regression. We included 71 datasets from 67 studies (48 completed in vitro) reporting a total of 19,590 tooth sites/surfaces. The most frequently reported classification systems were the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) (36 studies) and Ekstrand‐Ricketts‐Kidd (ERK) (15 studies). In reporting the results, no distinction was made between detection and diagnosis. Only two studies were at low risk of bias across all four domains, and 15 studies were at low concern for applicability across all three domains. The patient selection domain had the highest proportion of high risk of bias studies (49 studies). Four studies were assessed at high risk of bias for the index test domain, nine for the reference standard domain, and seven for the flow and timing domain. Due to the high number of studies on extracted teeth concerns regarding applicability were high for the patient selection and index test domains (49 and 46 studies respectively). Studies were synthesised using a hierarchical bivariate method for meta‐analysis. There was substantial variability in the results of the individual studies: sensitivities ranged from 0.16 to 1.00 and specificities from 0 to 1.00. For all visual classification systems the estimated summary sensitivity and specificity point was 0.86 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.90) and 0.77 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.82) respectively, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) 20.38 (95% CI 14.33 to 28.98). In a cohort of 1000 tooth surfaces with 28% prevalence of enamel caries, this would result in 40 being classified as disease free when enamel caries was truly present (false negatives), and 163 being classified as diseased in the absence of enamel caries (false positives). The addition of test type to the model did not result in any meaningful difference to the sensitivity or specificity estimates (Chi 2 (4) = 3.78, P = 0.44), nor did the addition of primary or permanent dentition (Chi 2 (2) = 0.90, P = 0.64). The variability of results could not be explained by tooth surface (occlusal or approximal), prevalence of dentinal caries in the sample, nor reference standard. Only one study intentionally included restored teeth in its sample and no studies reported the inclusion of sealants. We rat -Abstract Truncated-

Diagnostic Accuracy of Severe Periodontitis for Ramfjord Teeth Based on Different Classifications.

Accuracy of Partial-Mouth Examination Protocols for Extent and Severity Estimates of Periodontitis: a Study in a Chinese Population with Chronic Periodontitis.

[Study on the Detection of P. Gingivalis, A. Actinomycetemcomitans and T. Denticola and the Correlation Between Coinfections of the Microbes and Levels of Chronic Periodontitis Lesion].

The 2018 periodontitis case definition improves accuracy performance of full-mouth partial diagnostic protocols

Accuracy of Partial-Mouth Examination Protocols in Periodontal Epidemiological Surveys: a Systemic Review

Chronic Periodontitis Case Definitions and Confounders in Periodontal Research: A Systematic Assessment

The Accuracy of Probing Depth Measurements of Undergraduate Students and Associated Factors Analysis

Association of crown-root ratio and tooth survival in Chinese patients with advanced periodontitis: An 11-year retrospective cohort study

Proposing a Novel, Three-level Definition of Periodontitis Using Probing Depth, Clinical Attachment Loss and Bleeding on Probing: Analysis of a Rural Chinese Population.

A retrospective study on molar furcation assessment via clinical detection, intraoral radiography and cone beam computed tomography

Diagnostic accuracy of a point‐of‐care aMMP‐8 test in the discrimination of periodontal health and disease

[Predictive value of tooth loss risk with 2018 new classification of periodontitis:a literature review]

Discrepancy of Clinical Parameters Between the First and Second Molars Can Help to Differentiate Subjects with Aggressive Periodontitis from Chronic Periodontitis: a Cross-sectional Study Based on a Large Chinese Population.

Development and validation of a rule‐based algorithm to identify periodontal diagnosis using structured electronic health record data

Assessment of Treatment Quality Risk Factors Influencing the Radiographic Detection of Apical Periodontitis in Root-Filled Teeth: A Retrospective CBCT Analysis

Periodontitis in Ischemic Stroke Patients: Case Definition Challenges of the New Classification Scheme (2018)

Visual or visual-tactile examination to detect and inform the diagnosis of enamel caries.

Comparison of Periapical Radiography and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in En-Dodontic Treated Teeth for Assessment of Periapical Lesions

Development of an miRNA-Array-Based Diagnostic Signature for Periodontitis

Diagnostic accuracy of salivary active matrix metalloproteinase (aMMP)‐8 point‐of‐care test for detecting periodontitis in adults: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

The association between periodontitis patients' chief complaints and the stage of periodontitis: A clinical retrospective study