Abstract:We consider a Dynamic Workforce Acquisition (DWA) problem for crowdsourced last-mile delivery platforms that need to match supply (the number of available workers) with demand (the number of requested deliveries). This need arises due to the fact that the initial number of scheduled workers does not always match the number of requested deliveries. If the supply level is much lower than demand, the platform cannot guarantee on-time deliveries for many customers, which is undesirable; if, on the other hand, supply level is much higher than demand, it leads to a low worker utilization, which is also undesirable since it may discourage the freelance workers to continue working for the platform in the future. The question is how to dynamically acquire new workers (e.g., by sending out requests to work extra hours) such that supply level matches demand as closely as possible by the end of the planning horizon (i.e., the targeted service time). This is not a trivial problem. A key challenge here is due to the uncertainties in workers' response (i.e., when they will respond and whether they will respond positively to the request) and the uncertainties in new demand for deliveries at the targeted service time within the planning horizon. We first study a base model where workers respond immediately to the request, there is no new demand arriving within the planning horizon, and the costs of under-staffing and over-staffing are equal. We propose a simple heuristic policy and derive its performance bound. For this setting, we also provide a (close to) matching theoretical lower bound for any feasible non-anticipating policy. These results show that our policy is near-optimal. We also discuss how to modify our first policy for the setting where the costs of under-staffing and over-staffing are not necessarily the same. We show that our modified policy is robust with respect to the magnitude of these costs. Finally, we use the insights from the policies in the base model to construct a heuristic policy for a more general model with uncertainties in both workers' responses and demand arrivals. We derive performance bounds for two intuitive dynamic notification schedules and test their empirical performances using numerical experiments.

FedWM: Federated Crowdsourcing Workforce Management Service for Productive Laziness

Dynamic Workforce Acquisition for Crowdsourced Last-Mile Delivery Platforms

Ethically Aligned Opportunistic Scheduling for Productive Laziness

FedUP: Bridging Fairness and Efficiency in Cross-Silo Federated Learning

Fairness-Aware Job Scheduling for Multi-Job Federated Learning

FedDWA: Personalized Federated Learning with Dynamic Weight Adjustment

Federated learning with workload-aware client scheduling in heterogeneous systems

Contributions Estimation in Federated Learning: A Comprehensive Experimental Evaluation

Efficient Device Scheduling with Multi-Job Federated Learning

FedSAC: Dynamic Submodel Allocation for Collaborative Fairness in Federated Learning

Efficient Scheduling for Multi-Job Federated Learning Systems with Client Sharing

FedRich: Towards Efficient Federated Learning for Heterogeneous Clients Using Heuristic Scheduling

WassFFed: Wasserstein Fair Federated Learning

FedReMa: Improving Personalized Federated Learning via Leveraging the Most Relevant Clients

FedCA: Efficient Federated Learning with Client Autonomy

Towards Federated Learning on Fresh Datasets

Energy-Aware Incentive Mechanism for Hierarchical Federated Learning Using Water Filling Technique

FedSup: A Communication-Efficient Federated Learning Fatigue Driving Behaviors Supervision Framework

FedSA: A Semi-Asynchronous Federated Learning Mechanism in Heterogeneous Edge Computing

Federated Learning under Partially Class-Disjoint Data via Manifold Reshaping

Welfare and Fairness Dynamics in Federated Learning: A Client Selection Perspective