[Comparison of the impact of different fat emulsions on clinical outcomes in preterm infants with varying duration of parenteral nutrition: a randomized controlled multicenter study].

Rong Lin,Qing Yang,Ya-Sen Wang,Wei Shen,Xin-Zhu Lin,Si-Yu Song,Juan Kong,Fan Wu,Dong Yang,Rui-Miao Bai,Zhan-Kui Li,Shi-Rong Song,Wen-Ting Yu,Jian Mao,Yi-Jia Zhang,Juan Zhang,Xiao-Mei Tong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2303074
2023-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVES:To compare the impact of two types of fat emulsion on clinical outcomes in preterm infants with varying duration of parenteral nutrition (PN). METHODS:Preterm infants meeting the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to two groups: medium/long-chain triglyceride fat emulsion (referred to as MCT/LCT) group or multi-oil fat emulsion (containing soybean oil, medium-chain triglycerides, olive oil, and fish oil; referred to as SMOF) group. The infants were stratified into groups based on the duration of PN (15-21 days, 22-28 days, and ≥29 days). Clinical characteristics, nutritional status, biochemical indicators, and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS:Compared with the MCT/LCT group, the SMOF group had lower peak levels of triglyceride during the hospital stay in preterm infants with PN of 15-21 days, 22-28 days, and ≥29 days, respectively ( PPPPPCONCLUSIONS:Compared to MCT/LCT, SMOF have better lipid tolerance. With a longer duration of PN, SMOF does not increase the risks of PNAC and BPD and had a protective effect against brain injury. This suggests that in preterm infants requiring long-term PN, the use of SMOF is superior to MCT/LCT.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?