Data-driven Subgroups of Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes and the Relationship with Cardiovascular Diseases at Genetic and Clinical Levels in Chinese Adults.

Weihao Wang,Tong Jia,Yiying Liu,Hongrong Deng,Zihao Chen,Jing Wang,Zhaoxu Geng,Ran Wei,Jingtao Qiao,Yanhua Ma,Xun Jiang,Wen Xu,Jian Shao,Kaixin Zhou,Ying Li,Qi Pan,Wenying Yang,Jianping Weng,Lixin Guo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2023.102850
2023-01-01
Abstract:Background: To subgroup Chinese patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (T2D) by K-means cluster analysis on clinical indicators, and to explore whether these subgroups represent different genetic features and calculated cardiovascular risks.Methods: The K-means clustering analysis was performed on two cohorts (n = 590 and 392), both consisting of Chinese participants with newly diagnosed T2D. To assess genetic risks, multiple polygenic risk scores (PRSs) and mitochondrial DNA copy numbers (mtDNA-CN) were calculated for all participants. Furthermore, Framingham risk scores (FRS) of cardiovascular diseases in two cohorts were also calculated to verify the genetic risks.Results: Four clusters were identified including the mild age-related diabetes (MARD)(35.08%), mild obesity -related diabetes (MOD) (34.41%), severe autoimmune diabetes (SAID) 19.15%, and severe insulin-resistant diabetes (SIRD) 11.36% subgroups in the MARCH (metformin, and acarbose in Chinese patients as the initial hypoglycemic treatment) cohort. There was a significant difference in PRS for cardiovascular diseases (CVD) across four subgroups in the MARCH cohort (p < 0.05). Compared with the SIDD and SIRD subgroups, patients in the MOD subgroup had a relatively lower PRS for CVD (p < 0.05) in the MARCH cohort. Females had a higher PRS compared to males, with no significant difference in FRS across the four clusters. The MOD subgroup had a significantly lower FRS which was consistent with the results of PRS. Similar results of PRS and FRS were also replicated in the CONFIDENCE (comparison of glycemic control and b-cell function among newly diagnosed patients with type 2 diabetes treated with exenatide, insulin or pioglitazone) cohort.Conclusion: There are different CVD risks in diabetic subgroups based on clinical and genetic evidence which may promote precision medicine.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?