Multi-episodes of Pre-Cenozoic Bimodal Magmatism in the Himalaya in Response to Arc-Back-arc Settings

Shuaiqi Liu,Guibin Zhang,Lu Xiong,Shuzhen Wang,Feng Chang,Xue Liu,Lifei Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2023.107291
IF: 3.5
2023-01-01
Lithos
Abstract:The Himalayan orogen preserves multi-episodes of pre-Cenozoic magmatic history, but remains a subject of debate for their tectonic settings, limiting a better understanding of the Himalaya litho-tectonic structure. This study demonstrates the protolith nature of granitic gneisses and garnet amphibolites collected from three areas (Kangmar, Cona, and Arun Valley) in the east-central Himalaya. Then we investigated the bulk-rock major and trace elements, Sr-Nd isotopes, zircon U-Pb ages, and Hf isotopes. The garnet amphibolites are classified into sub-alkaline basalt and show tholeiite affinity. Garnet amphibolites from the Kangmar and Cona areas show Paleozoic (512-450 Ma) and Neoproterozoic (803 +/- 8 Ma) protolith ages, respectively. Geochemically, they display similar MORB-like trace element features and enrich in large ion lithophile elements (LILEs: Rb, Th, U, Sr, Pb) and Ta, Ti, and mantle-like Sr-Nd isotopes with initial Sr-87/Sr-86 of 0.667787-0.705088 and epsilon(Nd)(t) of 2.9-5.0. The high Th/Yb and Ba/Th ratios and varied epsilon(Hf)(t) (-22.3-11.0) indicate subduction-related material contributions. The geochemical affinity to MORB and slab contributions is associated with a back-arc basin setting. Besides, garnet amphibolites from Arun Valley yield a protolith age of 1869 +/- 10 Ma and are divided into two groups. Group I exhibits enriched LREE patterns [(La/Yb)(N) = 5.99-6.44] and shows wide epsilon(Nd)(t) of 1.3 to 7.1, variable Th/Ta and Nb/La, and high Zr/Y ratios. These features suggest the protolith of Group I might be continental flood basalts. In comparison, Group II exhibits MORB-like REE patterns, enrichments of LILEs, and depletions of high field strength elements (HFSEs) similar to island arc basalt. Thus, the geochemical affinity to MORB and arc-like features indicates they are metamorphosed from back-arc basalts. As for the granitic gneisses, the Kangmar and Cona samples give a Paleozoic age range of 552-438 Ma, due to a protracted (similar to 110 Myr) magmatism. The Kangmar granitic gneisses were metamorphosed from arc-related I-type granites, by contrast, the Cona granitic gneisses belong to A-type granites formed in a back-arc setting. These Paleozoic granitic gneisses show similar epsilon(Hf)(t) of 7.1--2.5 and T-DM2 of 1229-1923 Ma, indicating they were derived from partial melting of Meso- to Paleoproterozoic crust. Furthermore, the Arun Valley granitic gneisses give an 1819 +/- 6 Ma protolith age and show arc features with enriched LILEs and depleted HFSEs. The wide epsilon(Hf)(t) of -5.3-13.2 indicates the varying degree of mantle contributions resulting from slab break-off or roll-back. Therefore, the Himalaya witnessed bimodal magmatism during Paleoproterozoic, Neoproterozoic, and Paleozoic related to Andean-type orogeny. The multi-episodes of Andean-type magmatism contribute to the formation of the Cenozoic Himalayan architecture.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?