A SIGNIFICANT INCREMENT IN LEFT ATRIAL PRESSURE AFTER CRYOBALLOON ABLATION INDICATE WORSE ATRIAL FUNCTION: EVIDENCE FROM APPEARANCE-AF TRIAL

Zhongyuan Ren,Shubin Wu,Jiayu Wu,Yuan Zhong,Jun Xu,Hui Sun,Dongdong Zhao,Yawei Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0000939596.70844.e0
IF: 4.9
2023-01-01
Journal of Hypertension
Abstract:Objective: Left atrial pressure (LAP) is a direct reflection of left atrial function, while LAP could fluctuate following left atrial procedure. The pattern of LAP change in response to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and its significance remain to be explored. This study aimed to investigate the pattern of LAP change before and after PVI, and its correlation with other clinical profiles. Design and method: 28 patients underwent PVI using cryoballoon ablation were included (from APPEARANCE-AF trial). Pre-ablation and post-ablation LAP were directly measured via catheter. The correlation of LAP change with demographics, biochemical measurements, and speckle traced echocardiographic indexes of left atrium (LA) were investigated. Results: The included cohort has a mean age of 73.8±8.4 years old, with 12 male (42.9%). Instant PVI was achieved in all patients without complications. The average mean LAP (mLAP) measured before and after PVI was 8.2±4.5 mmHg (pre mLAP) and 14.0±6.5 mmHg (post mLAP), with a significant increment (↗mLAP: 5.8±4.5 mmHg, P<0.001). The change in LAP significantly correlated with LA strain rate in reservoir (LASr, r = -0.58, P = 0.001) and conduit phase (LAScd, r = 0.63, P<0.001) and LA ejection fraction (r = -0.48, P = 0.014). Correspondingly, patients with larger LAP increment (inc-mLAP, increment of mLAP>5 mmHg, n = 14) presented significant worse atrial function indicated by LASr (17.3%±5.6% ninc-mLAP vs 11.5%±7.3% inc-mLAP, P = 0.030), LAScd (-9.6%±2.2% ninc-mLAP vs -5.7%±3.6% inc-mLAP, P = 0.003). Conclusions: PVI could significantly increase LAP, and a higher change of LAP might indicate worse atrial function. The prognostic value of LAP change necessitates further follow-up evaluation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?