Abstract:Large-scale group decision making (LSGDM) is a powerful technology to deal with complex decision problems. As decision makers (DMs) in LSGDM come from different fields with various backgrounds and expertise, their perception of the same decision problem is largely divergent. The measure and improvement of consensus can obtain widely accepted decision results. In this process, the behaviors of DMs are interactive. The amount and direction of adjustments influence not only their consensus level but also that of other DMs. Therefore, the fairness and rationality of the consensus adjustment mechanism are fundamental. Considering the characteristics of LSGDM, this paper introduces two-stage consensus adjustment mechanisms from the perspective of cooperative game theory. In the first stage, players are DMs within each subgroup, and subgroups are regarded as players in the second stage. Further, the coalition payoffs are defined as the minimum consensus adjustment determined by the built models. To show the designated consensus adjustment cooperative games are essential, we prove that they are supperadditive. Considering the marginal contribution of DMs to consensus adjustment, a two-stage Shapley consensus adjustment mechanism is offered. Namely, the Shapley function is adopted to allocate the consensus adjustment to DMs and subgroups. When the Shapley consensus adjustment does not satisfy coalitional stability, a two-stage core-Nash bargaining consensus adjustment mechanism is provided, which can overcome the drawback of the two-stage Shapley consensus adjustment mechanism. Moreover, two new algorithms for LSGDM are proposed. Finally, a numerical example is provided to show the feasibility of the new method, and a comparison analysis is made. (c) 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Optimization Consensus Analysis for Group Decision Making in View of Non-Transferable and Transferable Allocation Schemes

An adaptive optimization consensus mechanism for group decision making using the Shapley allocation scheme

Consensus Adjustment for Multi-Attribute Group Decision Making Based on Cross-Allocation

An Adaptive Core-Nash Bargaining Game Consensus Mechanism for Group Decision Making

Consensus Reaching Process for Traditional Group Decision Making in View of the Optimal Adjustment Mechanism

Consensus Reaching in Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making: A Multi-Stage Optimization Feedback Mechanism with Individual Bounded Confidences

Managing Consistency and Consensus Issues in Group Decision-Making with Self-Confident Additive Preference Relations and Without Feedback: A Nonlinear Optimization Method

Consistency and Consensus of Distributed Preference Relations Based on Stochastic Optimal Allocation in GDM Problems

A Feedback Mechanism With Bounded Confidence- Based Optimization Approach for Consensus Reaching in Multiple Attribute Large-Scale Group Decision-Making

Group Decision Making with Heterogeneous Preference Structures: an Automatic Mechanism to Support Consensus Reaching

Building a Consensus for the Best-Worst Method in Group Decision-Making with an Optimal Allocation of Information Granularity

Consensus Analysis for Large-Scale Group Decision Making Based on Two-Stage Nash-Bargaining Game

Consensus Group Decision Making Based on Coalitional Nash-bargaining Game

Consensus reaching in multi-criteria social network group decision making: A stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis-based method

Managing Consensus and Weights in Iterative Multiple-Attribute Group Decision Making

Consensus Reaching for Ordinal Classification-Based Group Decision Making with Heterogeneous Preference Information

Cooperative Game Based Two-Stage Consensus Adjustment Mechanism for Large-Scale Group Decision Making

Managing non-cooperative behaviors and ordinal consensus through a self-organized mechanism in multi-attribute group decision making

An Adaptive Two-Stage Consensus Reaching Process Based on Heterogeneous Judgments and Social Relations for Large-Scale Group Decision Making

Two-stage Group Ordinal Consensus Optimization Ranking Approach Considering Multiple Optimal Consistency Adjustment Solutions

Consensus reaching with two-stage minimum adjustments in multi-attribute group decision making: A method based on preference-approval structure and prospect theory