Association Between Status of Medical Insurance and Self-Management Compliance, Metabolic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Yun Zhang,Wei Li,Xiaojin Yu,Li Yuan,Xiaohui Guo,Zilin Sun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-5809.2017.10.008
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the impact of status of medical insurance on self-management compliance and metabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in China. Methods This was an observational cross-sectional study including 5 852 patients with T2DM across 50 representative centers in China. Among these patients, 4 824 patients were covered by medical insurance (medical insurance group, MI group) whereas 1 028 patients were not (self-payment group, SP group). The data of demographics,medical history,metabolic parameters,diabetes related costs and self-management obedience were collected by questionnaire survey.A total of 1 281 subjects were included in the analysis which were 1:2 propensity score matched by sex, smoking, body mass index (BMI), smoking, diabetes duration,education level and age. One-way ANOVA and Chi-squared test were used to test the differences between the two groups. Pearson correlation analysis was applied in correlation test. Results (1)The average coverage of medical insurance was 82.43% in this population. Patients in MI group had lower levels of glycated hemoglobin A1c(HbA1c),fasting plasma glucose(FPG),2 hours postprandial plasma glucose(2hPG), triglycerides(TG)and total cholesterol(TC)than patients in SP group[HbA1c(8.6±2.4)% vs(9.0±2.4)%;FPG (8±3)vs(9±4)mmol/L;2hPG(12±5)vs(13±5)mmol/L;TG(2.0±1.6)vs(2.3±2.1)mmol/L;TC(4.8±1.4)vs (5.0 ± 1.5) mmol/L, F=4.229-21.620, all P<0.05]. Pearson correlation analysis also revealed a negative correlation between the status of medical insurance and the metabolic parameters previously mentioned(the corresponding correlation indexes were-0.079,-0.129,-0.129,-0.102,-0.057, respectively, all P<0.05). The prevalence of chronic complications in SP group were slightly higher than that in MI group but with no statistical significance (all P>0.05). Patients in MI group had higher costs related to diabetes [5 000 (3 000,10 000)vs 4 500(2 415,8 000)RMB,P<0.05]and higher compliance of self-management including diabetes education(81.26% vs 71.20%),reexamination(55.85% vs 45.67%),exercise(37.35% vs 29.27%), drug program (70.84% vs 58.54%), self-monitoring (24.82% vs 20.37%) and doctor visits (26.81% vs 18.74%) (χ2=2.906-18.838, all P<0.05 except the self-monitoring, P=0.088). Pearson correlation analysis revealed that MI had a positive correlation with diabetes self-management obedience (correlation indexes were 0.114,0.096,0.115,0.109,0.077,respectively).Conclusions There are 17.57% patients with T2DM not covered by medical insurance in this survey.Lacking of medical insurance may be associated with lower medical expenditure and self-management compliance, and consequently may lead to poorer metabolic control. These results suggest that the coverage of medical insurance for T2DM patients might play a potential role in the improvement of metabolic control.