Identifying the Mediating Role of Socioeconomic Status on the Relationship Between Schizophrenia and Major Depressive Disorder: a Mendelian Randomisation Analysis

Qiang Xu,Mengjing Cai,Yuan Ji,Juanwei Ma,Jiawei Liu,Qiyu Zhao,Yayuan Chen,Yao Zhao,Yijing Zhang,He Wang,Lining Guo,Kaizhong Xue,Zirui Wang,Mengge Liu,Chunyang Wang,Dan Zhu,Feng Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-023-00389-2
2023-01-01
Schizophrenia
Abstract:Depressive disorder prevalence in patients with schizophrenia has been reported to be 40%. People with low socioeconomic status (SES) are more likely to suffer from schizophrenia and major depressive disorder (MDD). However, the causal relationship between schizophrenia and depression and the potential mediating role of SES remains unclear. Two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses were conducted to explore the bidirectional causal relationship between schizophrenia and MDD with the largest sample size of European ancestry from public genome-wide association studies (sample size ranged from 130,644 to 480,359). Inverse variance weighted (IVW) method was used as the primary analysis, and several canonical MR methods were used as validation analyses. The mediating role of SES (educational years, household income, employment status, and Townsend deprivation index) was estimated by the two-step MR method. MR analyses showed that genetically predicted schizophrenia was associated with an increased risk of MDD (IVW odds ratio [OR] = 1.137 [95% CI 1.095, 1.181]). Reversely, MDD was also associated with an increased risk of schizophrenia (IVW OR = 1.323 [95% CI 1.118, 1.565]). The mediation analysis via the two-step MR method revealed that the causal effect of schizophrenia on MDD was partly mediated by the Townsend deprivation index with a proportion of 10.27%, but no significant mediation effect was found of SES on the causal effect of MDD on schizophrenia. These results suggest a robust bidirectional causal effect between schizophrenia and MDD. Patients with schizophrenia could benefit from the early and effective intervention of the Townsend deprivation index.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?