Improved Measurement of the Branching Fractions for J/ψ → Γπ0, Γη, and Γη′

M. Ablikim,J. Bai,Y. Ban,J. Bian,X. Cai,H. Chen,J. Chen,Jin Chen,Y. Chen,S. Chi,Y. Chu,X. Cui,Y. Dai,L. Diao,Z. Deng,Q. Dong,S. Du,J. Fang,S. Fang,C. Fu,C. Gao,Y. Gao,S. Gu,Y. Gu,Y. Guo,Z. Guo,F. Harris,K. He,M. He,Y. Heng,H. Hu,T. Hu,G. Huang,X. Huang,X. Ji,X. Jiang,J. Jiao,D. Jin,S. Jin,Yi Jin,Y. Lai,G. Li,H. Li,J. Li,R. Li,S. Li,W. Li,X. Li,Y. Li,Y. Liang,H. Liao,B. Liu,C. Liu,F. Liu,Fang Liu,H. Liu,J. Liu,Q. Liu,R. Liu,Z. Liu,Y. Lou,F. Lu,G. Lu,J. Lu,C. Luo,F. Ma,H. Ma,L. Ma,Q. Ma,X. Ma,Z. Mao,X. Mo,J. Nie,S. Olsen,H. Peng,R. Ping,N. Qi,H. Qin,J. Qiu,Z. Ren,G. Rong,L. Shan,L. Shang,C. Shen,D. Shen,X. Shen,H. Sheng,H. Sun,J. Sun,S. Sun,Y. Sun,Z. Sun,Z. Tan,X. Tang,G. Tong,G. Varner,D. Wang,L. Wang,M. Wang,P. Wang,W. Wang,Y. Wang,Z. Wang,Zhe Wang,Zheng Wang,C. Wei,D. Wei,N. Wu,X. Xia,X. Xie,G. Xu,X. Xu,Y. Xu,M. Yan,H. Yang,Y. Yang,M. Ye,Y. Ye,Z. Yi,G. Yu,C. Yuan,J. Yuan,Y. Yuan,S. Zang,Y. Zeng,Yu Zeng,B. Zhang,C. Zhang,D. Zhang,H. Zhang,J. Zhang,S. Zhang,X. Zhang,Yiyun Zhang,Z. Zhang,D. Zhao,J. Zhao,M. Zhao,P. Zhao,W. Zhao,Z. Zhao,H. Zheng,J. Zheng,Z. Zheng,L. Zhou,N. Zhou,K. Zhu,Q. Zhu,Y. Zhu,Yingchun Zhu,Z. Zhu,B. Zhuang,X. Zhuang,B. Zou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.108.092002
IF: 5.407
2023-01-01
Physical Review D
Abstract:Using a data sample of (1.0087 +/- 0.0044) x 10(10) J/psi events collected with the BESIII detector, the decays of J/psi -> gamma pi(0) (eta, eta ') -> gamma gamma gamma are studied. Newly measured branching fractions are B(J/psi -> gamma pi(0)) = (3.34 +/- 0.02 +/- 0.09) x 10(-5), B(J/psi -> gamma eta) = (1.096 +/- 0.001 +/- 0.019) x 10(-3), and B(J/psi -> gamma eta ') = (5.40 +/- 0.01 +/- 0.11) x 10(-3), where the first uncertainties are statistical and the second are systematic. These results are consistent with the world average values within two standard deviations. The ratio of partial widths Gamma(J/psi -> gamma eta ')/Gamma(J/psi -> gamma eta) is measured to be 4.93 +/- 0.13. The singlet-octet pseudoscalar mixing angle theta(P) is determined to be theta(P) = -(22.11 +/- 0.26)degrees or -(19.34 +/- 0.34)degrees with two different phenomenological models.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?