Persistence of AKT1 Low Quiescent Cancer Cells after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Patients.
Sheheryar Kabraji,Xavier Solé,Ying Huang,Clyde Bango,Michaela Bowden,Aditya Bardia,Dennis C. Sgroi,Massimo Loda,Sridhar Ramaswamy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.11579
IF: 45.3
2017-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:11579 Background: The mechanisms that allow triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) tumors to survive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) are incompletely understood. Evidence suggests that proliferative heterogeneity may contribute to primary chemotherapy resistance in patients with localized triple negative breast cancer. However, the detailed characterization of a drug-resistant cancer cell state in residual TNBC tissue after NACT has remained elusive. AKT1 low quiescent cancer cells (QCCs) are a quiescent, epigenetically plastic, and chemotherapy resistant subpopulation initially identified in experimental cancer models. Here, we asked whether AKT1 low QCCs actually exist in primary tumors from patients with TNBC and persist after treatment with NACT. Methods: We identified QCCs in primary and metastatic human breast tumors using automated, quantitative, immunofluorescence microscopy coupled with computational and statistical analysis. We obtained pre-treatment biopsy, post-treatment mastectomy, and metastatic specimens from a retrospective cohort of TNBC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy at Massachusetts General Hospital (n = 25). Using automated quantitative immunofluorescence microscopy, QCCs were identified as AKT low / H3K9me2 low / HES1 high cancer cells using prespecified immunofluorescence intensity thresholds. QCCs were represented as 2D and 3D digital tumor maps and QCC percentage (QCC-P) and QCC cluster index (QCC-CI) were determined for each sample. Results: We found that QCCs exist as non-random and heterogeneously distributed clusters within primary tumors. In addition, these QCC clusters are enriched after treatment with multi-agent, multi-cycle, neoadjuvant chemotherapy in both residual primary tumors as well as nodal and distant metastases in patients with triple negative breast cancer. Conclusions: Together, these data qualify QCCs as a non-genetic mechanism of chemotherapy resistance in triple negative breast cancer patients that warrants further study.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?