Robustness Analysis and Performance Tuning for the Quaternion Proportional–Derivative Attitude Controller
Haichao Gui,Anton H. J. de Ruiter
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g003585
2020-01-01
Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics
Abstract:No AccessEngineering NoteRobustness Analysis and Performance Tuning for the Quaternion Proportional–Derivative Attitude ControllerCorrections for this articleCorrection: Robustness Analysis and Performance Tuning for the Quaternion Proportional-Derivative Attitude ControllerHaichao Gui and Anton H. J. de RuiterHaichao GuiBeihang University, 100191 Beijing, People's Republic of China and Anton H. J. de RuiterRyerson University, Toronto, Ontario M5B 2K3, CanadaPublished Online:19 Aug 2018https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G003585SectionsRead Now ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail About References [1] Tsiotras P., "Further Passivity Results for the Attitude Control Problem," IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 43, No. 11, 1998, pp. 1597–1600. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/9.728877 IETAA9 0018-9286 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[2] Wallsgrove R. J. and Akella M. R., "Globally Stabilizing Saturated Attitude Control in the Presence of Bounded Unknown Disturbances," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 28, No. 5, 2005, pp. 957–963. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.9980 LinkGoogle Scholar[3] Sanyal A., Fosbury A., Chaturvedi N. and Bernstein D. S., "Inertia-Free Spacecraft Attitude Tracking with Disturbance Rejection and Almost Global Stabilization," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 32, No. 4, 2009, pp. 1167–1178. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.41565 LinkGoogle Scholar[4] Gui H. and Vukovich G., "Robust Switching of Modified Rodrigues Parameter Sets for Saturated Global Attitude Control," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 40, No. 6, 2017, pp. 1529–1542. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G002339 LinkGoogle Scholar[5] Hu Q., Jiang B. and Zhang Y., "Observer-Based Output Feedback Attitude Stabilization for Spacecraft with Finite-Time Convergence," IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology (to be published). Google Scholar[6] Wen J. T. Y. and Kreutz-Delgado K., "The Attitude Control Problem," IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 36, No. 10, 1991, pp. 1148–1162. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/9.90228 IETAA9 0018-9286 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[7] Seo D. and Akella M. R., "Separation Property for the Rigid-Body Attitude Tracking Control Problem," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 30, No. 6, 2007, pp. 1569–1576. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.30296 LinkGoogle Scholar[8] Mercker T. H. and Akella M. R., "Rigid-Body Attitude Tracking with Vector Measurements and Unknown Gyro Bias," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 34, No. 5, 2011, pp. 1474–1484. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.53111 LinkGoogle Scholar[9] Thienel J. and Sanner R. M., "A Coupled Nonlinear Spacecraft Attitude Controller and Observer with an Unknown Constant Gyro Bias and Gyro Noise," IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 48, No. 11, 2003, pp. 2011–2015. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2003.819289 IETAA9 0018-9286 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[10] Gui H. and Vukovich G., "Global Finite-Time Attitude Tracking via Quaternion Feedback," Systems and Control Letters, Vol. 97, Nov. 2016, pp. 176–183. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysconle.2016.09.017 SCLEDC 0167-6911 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[11] Mahony R., Cha S. and Hamel T., "A Coupled Estimation and Control Analysis for Attitude Stabilisation of Mini Aerial Vehicles," Proceedings of the Australian Conference on Robotics and Automation [CD-ROM], Australian Robotics and Automation Association (ACRA), Australia, Sydney, 2006. Google Scholar[12] Pounds P., Hamel T. and Mahony R., "Attitude Control of Rigid Body Dynamics from Biased IMU Measurements," Proceedings of the 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, IEEE Publ., Piscataway, NJ, Dec. 2007, pp. 4620–4625. Google Scholar[13] Khosravian A. and Namvar M., "Rigid Body Attitude Control Using a Single Vector Measurement and Gyro," IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 57, No. 5, 2012, pp. 1273–1279. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2011.2174663 IETAA9 0018-9286 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[14] Hu J. and Zhang H., "Bounded Output Feedback of Rigid-Body Attitude via Angular Velocity Observers," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 36, No. 4, 2013, pp. 1240–1248. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.57187 LinkGoogle Scholar[15] Zou A.-M., "Finite-Time Output Feedback Attitude Tracking Control for Rigid Spacecraft," IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2014, pp. 338–345. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2013.2246836 IETTE2 1063-6536 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[16] Akella M. R., Thakur D. and Mazenc F., "Partial Lyapunov Strictification: Smooth Angular Velocity Observers for Attitude Tracking Control," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 38, No. 3, 2015, pp. 442–451. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000779 LinkGoogle Scholar[17] Yang S., Akella M. R. and Mazenc F., "Immersion and Invariance Observers for Gyro-Free Attitude Control Systems," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 11, 2016, pp. 2570–2577. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G002095 LinkGoogle Scholar[18] Gui H. and Vukovich G., "Finite-Time Angular Velocity Observers for Rigid-Body Attitude Tracking with Bounded Inputs," International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2017, pp. 15–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.v27.1 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[19] de Ruiter A. H. J., "Spacecraft Attitude Tracking with Guaranteed Performance Bounds," Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, Vol. 36, No. 4, 2013, pp. 1214–1221. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.56264 LinkGoogle Scholar[20] de Ruiter A. H. J., "Observer-Based Spacecraft Attitude Tracking with Guaranteed Performance Bounds," Proceedings of the 2015 American Control Conference, IEEE Publ., Piscataway, NJ, July 2015, pp. 3212–3217. Google Scholar[21] de Ruiter A. H. J., "Observer-Based Adaptive Spacecraft Attitude Control with Guaranteed Performance Bounds," IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 61, No. 10, 2016, pp. 3146–3151. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2015.2503719 IETAA9 0018-9286 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[22] Singla P., Subbarao K. and Junkins J. L., "Adaptive Output Feedback Control for Spacecraft Rendezvous and Docking Under Measurement Uncertainty," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2006, pp. 892–902. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.17498 LinkGoogle Scholar[23] Gui H. and de Ruiter A. H. J., "Control of Asteroid-Hovering Spacecraft with Disturbance Rejection Using Position-Only Measurements," Journal Of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 40, No. 10, 2017, pp. 2401–2416. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G002617 LinkGoogle Scholar[24] Khalil H. K., Nonlinear Systems, 3rd ed., Prentice–Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2002, pp. 303–334. Google Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byFault-tolerant control for full-state error constrained attitude tracking of uncertain spacecraftAutomatica, Vol. 151Koopman-Operator-Based Attitude Dynamics and Control on SO(3)18 September 2022Adaptive Fault-Tolerant Attitude Tracking Control for Flexible Spacecraft With Guaranteed Performance BoundsIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 58, No. 3Neural network-based reinforcement learning control for combined spacecraft attitude tracking maneuversNeurocomputing, Vol. 484Observer-Based Fault-Tolerant Spacecraft Attitude Tracking Using Sequential Lyapunov AnalysesIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 66, No. 12Learning-based Attitude Takeover Control for Noncooperative Space Targets with Unknown DynamicsKoopman-Operator-Based Attitude Dynamics and Control on SO(3)Ti Chen and Jinjun Shan2 September 2020 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 43, No. 11Attitude Tracking Control for Rigid-Flexible Coupled Spacecraft with Guaranteed Performance BoundsYan Xiao, Anton H. J. de Ruiter, Dong Ye and Zhaowei Sun24 December 2019 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 43, No. 2Learning-based Attitude Takeover Control Strategy for Noncooperative Targets with Gaussian ProcessesYuhan Liu, Lv Yueyong, Guangfu Ma and Yanning Guo5 January 2020Related articlesCorrection: Robustness Analysis and Performance Tuning for the Quaternion Proportional-Derivative Attitude Controller27 Dec 2018Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics What's Popular Volume 41, Number 10October 2018 CrossmarkInformationCopyright © 2018 by Haichao Gui and Anton H.J. de Ruiter. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the ISSN 0731-5090 (print) or 1533-3884 (online) to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp. TopicsApplied MathematicsControl TheoryElementary AlgebraFeedback ControlGeneral PhysicsGuidance, Navigation, and Control SystemsSpacecraft Guidance and Control KeywordsQuaternionsProportional DerivativeAttitude Control SystemAttitude TrackingSatellitesKinetic EnergyEarthSpacecraft AttitudeComputingPrediction AlgorithmsAcknowledgmentsThis research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under the project 11702010, the Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures (NUAA MCMS-0118G01), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities YWF-18-BJ-Y-185, and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada through a Discovery Accelerator Supplement RGPAS-493042-2016. The authors would like to thank the Associate Editor and the anonymous reviewers for all the insightful comments that led to significant improvement of the paper.PDF Received23 January 2018Accepted28 May 2018Published online19 August 2018