Accuracy of lung and abdominal ultrasound for tuberculosis diagnosis: a prospective cohort study from India
Stefan Fabian Weber,Rebecca Wolf,Katharina Manten,Balamugesh Thangakunam,Barney Isaac,Deepa Shankar,Divya Mangal,Amit Kumar Dutta,Leena Robinson Vimala,Aparna Irodi,Frank Tobian,Lisa Koeppel,Julia Selena Beck,Peter Wolf,Sabine Belard,Claudia M Denkinger,Devasahayam Jesudas Christopher,the ALL POCUS TB study group
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.07.24308357
2024-06-12
Abstract:Background:
Point-of care ultrasound is considered to hold promise in tuberculosis (TB) screening. However, most available abdominal ultrasound data focuses on HIV-infected cohorts and for lung ultrasound (LUS) data is very sparse. We aimed to determine accuracy of lung and abdominal ultrasound in a cohort of presumed TB in a tertiary care hospital in India.
Methods:
Adult patients with presumed TB were enrolled prospectively and underwent a comprehensive ultrasound evaluation. Accuracy of individual and a predetermined combination of findings was determined against a TB reference standard (mycobacterial culture and PCR). Diagnostic potential of a multi-variable model combining clinical and ultrasound findings was explored using generalized mixed methods and random forest approach. (German trial registry DRKS00026636)
Findings:
We included 541 participants of whom 102 (19%) had TB and 1% had HIV. Focused assessment with sonography for HIV-associated tuberculosis (FASH) showed moderate sensitivity (51%, 95%-CI 41-60) and specificity (70%, 95%-CI 66-74). Small consolidations on LUS showed high sensitivity (98%, 95%-CI 93-99), but were unspecific (14%, 95%-CI 11-18). Exploratory LUS variations showed higher specificity (e.g., large apical consolidations: sensitivity 22%, specificity 86%). Predictive modelling for ultrasound and clinical variables revealed an Area Under the Curve of 0.79 in the receiving operator curve.
Interpretation:
Accuracy of ultrasound does not meet requirements of a stand-alone diagnostic or screening test. However, accuracy for some ultrasound findings is comparable with CXR. Additionally, ultrasound may aid disease severity assessment and microbiological sampling strategies. Research into alternative analyses (e.g., artificial intelligence) may enable wider applications.
Funding:
Grant TTU 02.911, German Center for Infection Research (Deutsches Zentrum fuer Infektionsforschung).
Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)