A sensitive method for quantitative measurement of plasma dna: a marker for cancer progression and treatment
Mei Zhang,Hengshan Zhang,Aiguo Zhang,Lulu Zhang,Yunqing Ma,Shanmin Yang,Wei Wang,Weimin Sun,Chaomei Liu,Kunzhong Zhang,Liangjie Yin,Bruce Fenton,Peter Keng,Paul Okunieff,Lurong Zhang
IF: 11.2
2008-01-01
Cancer Research
Abstract:3642 Introduction: Necrosis is a common characteristic of cancer progression, and causes the release of DNA into the circulation. This cell death and release of DNA is due in part to uncontrolled tumor growth overwhelming the capacity of its supply of oxygen and nutrients. The DNA fragments released from spontaneous apoptosis of cancer cells can also enter the circulation and be detected in plasma. While plasma DNA level is likely to be a marker for cancer progression and treatment, the method for rapid and quantitative measurement of plasma DNA without extraction is not well developed. Recently, we have utilized QuantiGene 2.0 technology to develop a method that can sensitively measure the level of plasma DNA with potential for monitoring cancer progression and treatment. Methods: A novel assay based on QuantiGene 2.0 technology was developed. Several capture probes were designed to immobilize the plasma DNA on plate. The bound DNA was detected using several layers of amplifications, i.e. the label extender, preamplifier, amplifier and label probe conjugated with alkaline phosphatase. The substrate Lumigen APS-5 yields chemiluminescence (RLU), which is quantitatively related to the amount of bound DNA. The plasma DNA was measured in plasma sample from 1) normal adults; 2) patients with different diseases, including lymphoma, leukemia, liver cancer; 3) patients with autoimmune disease, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) which has antibody generated against autologous DNA; 4) pregnant subjects; and 5) leukemia patient that had received radiation for bone marrow transplantation (BMT). The significance of results was assessed. Results: The correlation co-efficient (R value) between RLU and plasma DNA concentration of our assay was 0.9996. While the normal adults had a very low level of plasma DNA, all the cancer patients (lymphoma, leukemia and liver cancer) had much higher (11-26 fold). The patients with SLE also had a high level of plasma DNA as did pregnant women. The leukemia patients who received TBI (1.65 Gy BID x 4 days) prior to BMT had a huge surge (about 140 times normal) of plasma DNA seen immediately after the first dose of total body radiation (TBI), and which remained high during the whole course of radiation. When TBI was stopped on day 6, the level gradually declined to the basal level on day 9. Conclusion: We have developed a highly sensitive method to determine the plasma DNA level. The method can be used for several clinical applications, and has potential for monitoring cancer progression and therapeutic effect. The value of this index will be tested in a large-scale clinical trial.