Comparison of Clinical Characteristics Between Hospitalacquired and Communityacquired Acute Renal Failure

Fan Minhu,Yue Wang
2005-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the differences between hospitalacquired acute renal failure(HAARF) and communityacquired acute renal fail ure (CAARF) in epidemiology, etiology and prognosis. Methods The diagnosis of ARF of patients diagnosed with ARF from ICD9 codes, who were discharged from Peking University Third Hospital from January 1994 to December 2003, was reconfirmed and categorized by two nephrologists independently. The indexes of epidemiology, etiology and prognosis were studied. Single variable analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were per formed to investigate the correlation between clinical features and prognosis re spectively. Results Two hundred and five cases were collected and all were reconfirmed. CA ARF had a predominance of 59.5%. HAARF, however, increased by 1.06 times in last 5 years (P0.05); 59.0% of HAARF wa s d iagnosed in department of surgery while 70.5% of CAARF was in medica l department (both P0.05); 36.1% HAARF patients h ad two or more pathogenic causes, while 91.2% CAARF only had one cause (P0.05); 49.4% HAARF developed after o peration; 26.5% HAARF and 18.8% CAARF were drugrelated (P0.05); 24.1% HAARF an d 12.3% CAARF were infectionrelated (P=0 .028). Mortality and recovery rates were 62.7% and 20.6%, respectively, i n HA ARF while 23.0% and 67.2% in CAARF respectively (b oth P 0.01). The percentage of oliguria, multiple organ failure (MOF), systemic in fl ammatory response syndrome (SIRS), and use of mechanical ventilation were sign if icantly higher in HAARF than in CAARF (all P0. 01 ). Acute tubule necrosisinjury severity score (ATNISS), acute pathological and choronic health evaluation (APACHE Ⅱ) score were 0.54±0.24 and 19.6±4.9 in HAARF, while they were 0.27±0.18 and 15.7±5.6 in CAARF (both P0.01). Multiple regression analysis identified that both MOF and S IRS were common independent risk factors for HAARF and CA ARF, and oliguria and advanced age were respective independent risk factor for HAARF and CAARF. Conclusion CAARF prevails in hospitalized Chinese patients during the last 10 years, but HAARF is increasing in incidence significantly durin g t he last 5 years. The etiology is mostly simple and the prognosis is relatively g ood in CAARF, while the pathogenic cause is mostly complicated and the outcome is much poorer in HAARF.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?