Abstract:Background: The ideal depth of general anesthesia should achieve the required levels of hypnosis, analgesia, and muscle relaxation while minimizing physiologic responses to awareness. The choice of anesthetic strategy in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) undergoing major noncardiac surgery is becoming an increasingly important issue as the population ages. This is because general anesthesia is associated with a risk of perioperative cardiac complications and death, and this risk is much higher in people with CHD. Aim: To compare hemodynamic function and cardiovascular event rate between etomidate- and propofol-based anesthesia in patients with CHD. Methods: This prospective study enrolled consecutive patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists grade II/III) with stable CHD (New York Heart Association class I/II) undergoing major noncardiac surgery. The patients were randomly allocated to receive either etomidate/remifentanil-based or propofol/remifentanil-based general anesthesia. Randomization was performed using a computer-generated random number table and sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes. Concealment was maintained until the patient had arrived in the operating theater, at which point the consulting anesthetist opened the envelope. All patients, data collectors, and data analyzers were blinded to the type of anesthesia used. The primary endpoints were the occurrence of cardiovascular events (bradycardia, tachycardia, hypotension, ST-T segment changes, and ventricular premature beats) during anesthesia and cardiac troponin I level at 24 h. The secondary endpoints were hemodynamic parameters, bispectral index, and use of vasopressors during anesthesia. Results: The final analysis included 40 patients in each of the propofol and etomidate groups. The incidences of bradycardia, hypotension, ST-T segment changes, and ventricular premature beats during anesthesia were significantly higher in the propofol group than in the etomidate group (P < 0.05 for all). The incidence of tachycardia was similar between the two groups. Cardiac troponin I levels were comparable between the two groups both before the induction of anesthesia and at 24 h after surgery. When compared with the etomidate group, the propofol group had significantly lower heart rates at 3 min after the anesthetic was injected (T1) and immediately after tracheal intubation (T2), lower systolic blood pressure at T1, and lower diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure at T1, T2, 3 min after tracheal intubation, and 5 min after tracheal intubation (P < 0.05 for all). Vasopressor use was significantly more in the propofol group than in the etomidate group during the induction and maintenance periods (P < 0.001). Conclusion: In patients with CHD undergoing noncardiac major surgery, etomidate-based anesthesia is associated with fewer cardiovascular events and smaller hemodynamic changes than propofol-based anesthesia.

Haemodynamic and Hormonic Responses among Propofol, Thiopental and Etomidate During Induction and Endotracheal Intubation

Effect of Etomidate and Propofol on Hemodynamics and Heart Rate Variety During Rapid Sequence Induction in Emergency Brain Interventional Neuroradiology Patients

Comparison of the Effects of Etomidate Versus Propofol on Cerebral Oxygen Metabolism in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery

[Comparative hemodynamic study of anesthesia induction with propofol (Diprivan), thiopental, methohexital, etomidate and midazolam in patients with coronary disease]

Effect of different doses of remifentanil on haemodynamics and plasma cortisol concentration during induction of anaesthesia

Effect of Etomidate Versus Combination of Propofol-Ketamine and Thiopental-Ketamine on Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial

Clinical study of propofol with different concentration of fentanyl by target- controlled infusion

Propofol/fentanyl versus etomidate/fentanyl for the induction of anesthesia in patients with aortic insufficiency and coronary artery disease

A comparison between target-controlled and manually controlled propofol infusions in patients undergoing routine surgical procedures.

The Effect of Different Dosage of Propofol on Cardiovascular Responses to Tracheal Intubation in Hypertensive Patients

The bispectral index values and the stress response during anesthesia induction by target-controlled influsion of propofol

Variation of hemodynamic response following induction and tracheal intubation: etomidate vs midazolam

Effect of atropine on endotracheal intubation time with rocuronium in children

Effect of etomidate and propofol induction on hemodynamic and endocrine response in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting/mitral valve and aortic valve replacement surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass

Influences of Different Doses of Esmolol on Intubation Response

Etomidate Anesthesia During ERCP Caused More Stable Haemodynamic Responses Compared with Propofol: A Randomized Clinical Trial

On changes of bispectral index and hemodynamic responses during anesthesia induction with target-controlled infusion of sufentanil:A prospective randomized controlled trial

Target-controlled Infusion of Propofol Combined with Remifentanil or Fentanyl: a Comparison of Anesthetic Depth

Effect of three opioids used as induction agent in general anesthesia on intubation reaction of senile patients

Etomidate vs propofol in coronary heart disease patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery: A randomized clinical trial

The Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine on Hemodynamic Response to Endotracheal Intubation During Sufentanil-Based Induction of Anaesthesia