Comparative Investigation and Evaluation of Detection for Anti-Nuclear Antibodies Labeled by Quantum Dots with Two Different Types of Size

Ning Gu

2012-01-01

Abstract:Objective To compare the imaging effect of anti-nuclear antibodies(ANA) detected by indirect immunofluorescence assay(IIFA) based on quantum dots(QDs) labeling with two different types of size,and evaluate their clinical application.Methods Using Hep-2 cells as experimental matrix,QD655 and QD605 as the marker of the secondary antibody,the titers and the immunofluorescence patterns of ANA bound to the intracellular components were detected by IIFA in 114 ANA-positive patients and 30 ANA-negative controls.The results of assay were compared with those of the assay in which fluorescein isothiocyanate(FITC) was used as the marker of the secondary antibody.Single specific ANA was further confirmed by immunoblotting technique.Results The fluorescent patterns of ANA detected by the two QDs in the 114 patients were identical or similar with those detected by FITC markers.However,the sensibilities of 3 assay varied with different labeling markers.For the patterns of nuclear speckle and cytoplasmic granule,the highest sensibility was visualized in the assay with QD655 as the marker,followed by QD605,and the lowest was FITC.For the patterns of nuclear homogeneity,nucleolus and centromere,the highest sensibility was visualized by FITC marker,followed by QD655,and the lowest was QD605.Correlation analysis showed that ANA titers detected by the both of QDs markers were highly correlated with those of FITC markers,and the correlation coefficient values were 0.834 for QD 655 and 0.832 for QD605,respectively(P0.01).The coincidence rates of detected ANA were 100% between the two QDs and FITC markers for the patterns of nucleus speckle and cytoplasm granule,but for the patterns of nuclear homogeneity and nucleolus,the coincidence rates were from 80.6% to 84.4% between the two QDs and FITC markers.Among 30 ANA-negative controls detected by FITC marker,one was ANA-positive by the two QDs markers.The overall coincidence rate was more than 90.0% for the results of ANA detection between the two QDs and FITC markers(Kappa values 0.75).Conclusion The IIFA with both QD655 and QD605 as the marker of secondary antibody was stable,sensitive and feasible for the detection of ANA in serum.The sensitivity of the assay increased with larger size of QDs.However,the ANA of some immunofluorescence patterns with low titer,including nuclear homogeneity,nucleolus and centromere,may be undetectable by the IIFA with QDs markers.