Early Evaluation of Imatinib in Treatment of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Using CT Imaging

Shen Lin
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the value of RECIST and Choi criteria in the evaluation of imatinib in treatment of GIST.Methods The clinical data of 176 cases of GIST treated by imatinib during April 2003 to January 2008 were analyzed retrospectively.Among them,26 cases had medium and short term(2-6months) CT follow-ups were enrolled into the study.CT scans were performed on Siemens plus4 and GE 64-slices MDCT.The size and CT values were measured on axial images.The mean length-diameter and CT values were measured according to RECIST and Choi criteria(≤5/or-gan,≤10/case) .The change rate of length-diameter and CT values were computed.All patients were divided into good-response group(GoodR) and poor-response group(PoorR) according to RECIST and Choi criteria respectively.The TTP of different groups divided by different criteria using Kaplan-Meier were compared.Results There were 7 cases of good responders and 19 cases of poor responders by RECIST criteria,and the response rate was 27%.There were 19 cases of responders and 7 cases of non-responders by Choi criteria,and the response rate was 73%.The median follow-up was 23.5 months.The median time to progression(TTP) was 17.5 months up to January 2008.There was no statistical significance of TTP between good responder and poor responder groups(P=0.910) according to RECIST criteria,and there was statistical significance of TTP(P=0.000) according to Choi criteria.Conclusion Choi criteria is superior to RECIST criteria in the CT evaluation of GIST treated by imatinib.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?