Implicit Mental Characteristics in College Students with Interpersonal Disturbances

Qi Zhang
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To explore the mental characteristics in individuals with interpersonal disturbances( ID),provide the theoretical foundation of psychodiagnostic and psychological intervention. Methods: Totally 329 college students w ere selected and divided into three groups according to the scores of the Interpersonal Relationships Integrated Diagnosis Questionnaire( IRIDQ),namely,the ID group( w ith the IRIDQ scores of 15- 28,n = 43),common group( w ith the IRIDQ scores of 9- 12. 11,n = 50),and non-interpersonal disturbances( non-ID) group( w ith the IRIDQ scores of 0- 3. 76,n = 50). Then reaction time( RT),hit and false alarm rates of cognition,implicit emotion and behavioral intention w ere measured w ith the Go / No-go Association Task( GNAT) and emotional Stroop paradigm. Among these indices,hit and false alarm rates w ere employed to calculate d' sensitivity scores. Results: The main effects of group w ere significant in average reaction time( ART) of cognition,implicit emotion and behavioral intention( Ps 0. 01). Further multiple comparison results show ed that there w ere significant differences in ART of cognition test among the three groups. The ART of positive cognition w as significant longer in the ID group than in the common group and non-ID group [( 594. 2 ± 17. 0) ms vs.( 533. 4 ± 15. 5) ms vs.( 503. 3 ± 13. 9) ms,Ps 0. 01],w hile the ART of negative cognition w as significant shorter in the ID group than in the common group and non-ID group [( 554. 5 ± 18. 5) ms vs.( 600. 6 ± 28. 8) ms vs.( 610. 4 ± 19. 8) ms,Ps 0. 01]. In test of emotion,the ART w as longer in the ID group than in the common group and non-ID group [for positive emotional w ords,( 442. 1 ± 18. 5) ms vs.( 415. 6 ± 17. 5) ms vs.( 395. 7 ± 12. 9) ms; for negative emotional w ords,( 434. 3 ± 17. 5) ms vs.( 390. 1 ± 13. 1) ms vs.( 389. 8 ± 15. 5) ms,Ps 0. 01]. In experiment of behavioral intention,the ART of social situations w as longer in the ID group than in the common group and non-ID group [( 593. 6 ± 10. 7) ms vs.( 395. 6 ± 12. 0) ms vs.( 381. 2 ± 8. 1) ms,Ps 0. 01],and the d' value in the ID group w as smaller than in the common group and non-ID group [( 0. 8 ± 0. 6) vs.( 1. 8 ± 0. 8) vs.( 2. 2 ± 0. 6),Ps 0. 05]. Conclusion: These results indicate that the individuals w ith ID may show more negative individual cognition,and emotional interference,and exhibit a characteristic implicit w ithdraw al behavior in social life.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?