Comparison of the Undergraduate Curricula in Resources and Environment&Urban and Rural Planning Management
赵小风,黄贤金,李光录,吴小根,陆汝成,张兴榆,甘奇慧
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13718/j.cnki.xsxb.2008.04.034
2008-01-01
Abstract:Based on network searching and investigation,teaching plans of resources and environment ur- ban and rural planning management in some colleges were obtained,and curriculums in 10 typical colleges were analyzed comparatively.Research results areas follows.Firstly,public required course,academic basal courses,professionally required course,professionally selective courses,public selective courses and practical courses constitute the curriculum system.Secondly,the overlapping of speciality in comprehen- sive universities was greater than other colleges.General colleges pay more attention to build academic basal courses,and agriculture and forestry colleges spend more funds and time on practice teachings.Last- ly,academic basal courses and professionally required course can be fractionized into such course groups as geography science,computer science and 3S,resources and environment management and urban and rural planning.Deferent characteristics can be manifested in the course groups of their colleges.In order to de- velop the speciality and foster professionals,some advices such as enhancing intercommunication,develo- ping speciality feature,training teachers and building up textbooks,are put forward.