Evidence-Based Ship Accident Consequence Analysis Using Heterogeneous-Source Accident Reports

Liye Zhang,Hua Wang,Qingwei Meng
2016-01-01
Abstract:Shipping movements are operated in more and more complex environment due to increasing maritime traffic demand. Fatal ship accidents are nightmares for seafarers. A wide range of methods have been introduced for ship accident consequence analysis. However, almost all existing academic studies focus on experts’ understanding, but overlook the potential valuable evidence in real ship accident cases. Actually, a large amount of ship accident reports with detailed accident information are available online and freely accessible. In this paper, the authors present a systemic framework for the evidence-based ship accident analysis using real ship accident reports and show some knowledge extracted from the real accident records. The first task of the proposed framework is to review ship accident reports and extract related accident information. Different from previous studies, the accident information of both during-accident stage and post-accident stage are considered and examined. To further show the fulfillment of this task, 477 accident reports are reviewed. The next task is to explore ship accident frequency according to various accident types and accident consequences. The last framework component aims to investigate the relationship between contributory factors and accident consequences. Specifically, a series of statistic examinations including nonparametric statistics of Kendall's tau coefficient analysis, Cramer's V coefficient analysis and Kruskal-Wallis test are carried out to figure out the relationship. The statistical analysis indicates that the significance of contributory factors exhibits distinguished diversity according to ship accident and consequence types. For example, ship speed remarkably contributes to human injury and fatality in ship collisions, but not significantly in ship groundings. The results are beneficial to facilitate the ship risk mitigation and, to validate and advance the existing accident consequence analysis models.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?