Abstract:The article argues that the Fast Track Land Reform Programme should be viewed from a security and strategic perspective motivated by its historiographical heritage regarded as worthy of preservation. It has always been a sensitive issue so compelling that successive colonial administrations, setter regimes and governments were determined to utilize all their instruments of power to exert authority for its preservation and control. The Fast Track Land Reform Programme, like its predecessors was a clear expression of the close relationship between foreign, domestic and military policy in pursuit of national goals and values. The subtext of the article is the assertion of the principle of self-determination over the right of ownership of land on a people as expressed by the United Nations norms and values. The aim of the article is to interrogate the security and strategic dimension of the Fast Track Land Reform Programme. The article argues that the involvement of the Zimbabwe Defence Forces in the Fast Track Land Reform Programme must be understood and analysed from the long held Clauzewitzian philosophy of the crucial inter-relationship between; foreign, domestic, and military policy (Dimitriu, 2018). Four main areas are discussed: the historical land brutal military conquests through the foreign policy pronouncements at the 1884/5 Berlin conference; the United Nations Resolution on the colonised people and how the Lancaster House torpedoed the principle in 1979; the constitutional provisions and prescriptions on the repossession of land; the historical role of Armed Forces in supporting civilian authorities in the implementation of domestic and foreign policy objectives deemed to be of security and strategic nature by successive colonial and settler regimes in Zimbabwe. The major findings of the study provide the modern classical background theoretic, necessary principles that explain the legitimacy and rationale for the professional military involvement in politics of the day. The study concludes that the issue of land on a State or Nation is an emotive matter, which can easily be a source of conflict, if not addressed from a security and strategic perspective.

R2P and the Zimbabwean Crisis: Rescuing a Sinking Ship

R2P And The Zimbabwean Crisis

Zimbabwe's success story in education and health: will it weather economic structural adjustment?

Misapplying R2P in Sri Lanka

T Kondo (Ed) Law and Investment in Africa: The Governance of Foreign Direct Investment In Zimbabwe

Corporate Social Responsibility in Challenging Times in Developing Countries

Economic liberation or economic distress: Evaluation of Zimbabwe’s foreign exchange circus and its impact on the financial system

Conclusion: Fixing Haiti–MINUSTAH and beyond

Rwanda: Progress or Powder Keg?

The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda: A Paper Umbrella in the Rain? Initial Pitfalls and Brighter Prospects

The Root Causes of Bank Failures in Zimbabwe Since the Year 2008 to 2015

Post-crisis Zimbabwe’s innovative financing mechanisms in the social sectors: a practical approach to implementing the new deal for engagement in fragile states

Zambia debt crisis faces imminent tipping point

Security Strategic Dimensions of the ‘Fast Track’ Land Reform Programme in Zimbabwe: A Socio-Political Discourse

Debt, distress, dispossession: towards a critical political economy of Africa’s financial dependency

The Implications of the Russia–Ukraine War on Sustainable Development Goals in Africa

Era of uniform African debt restructuring at an end

Repatriation: Its Role in Resolving Africa's Refugee Dilemma

The Impact of (Un)Ethical Survival Mode Duality and Choices of the Educational Elite on the African Renaissance

Corporate Social Responsibility: Community Voices from Shurugwi, Mhondoro-Ngezi and Zvishavane in Zimbabwe