[IUD Insertion at 42-90 Days after Cesarean Section: a 2-Year Prospective Study of Safety and Efficacy]

Shu Tao
1994-01-01
Abstract:Classical cesarean section had been replaced by lower segment cesarean section for decades. On the basis of anatomy histology and physiology the lower uterine segment becomes the isthmus of uterine cervix after puerperium that is after 42 days post-partum. Therefore IUD is not in contact with the uterine scar when it is inserted after puerperium retrospective investigation of 200 cases in 1987 a prospective study of 620 consecutive cases of IUD insertion after cesarean section and vaginal birth 310 for each group was conducted VCu 200 IUD was Inserted. Follow up rate was 99.19%. Breast feeding rate 81.3%. The mean time of breast feeding was 5.9+0.24 months. The net cumulative life table continuation rates were 92.9% at 1 year and 86.38% at 2 years no significant difference was found in comparison with the vaginal birth group. Dilatation of cervix was not needed in 94.7%. The length of uterine cavity was 11.8+0.07cm significantly longer than after vaginal birth (10.89=0.06). The mean bleeding days were 5.38+0.39 no significant difference with the control. Adverse side effects such as menorrhagia irregular bleeding prolonged menstrual period shortening menstrual cycle profuse leucorrhea backache lower abdominal-pain showed no significant difference with the control. There were no complications such as injury perforation extrauterine migration infection bleeding etc. There was lectopic pregnancy (0.32%). Conclusion: IUD insertion at 42 ~ 90 days after lower segment cesarean is safe and effective and is worth to advocate. (authors)
What problem does this paper attempt to address?