Keys to Promoting the Graded Diagnosis and Treatment System Based on the Integrated Health Care System in China

Qingqing Jiang,Yiling Lou,Fan Chen,Zuxun Lu,Shiyi Cao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmab102
2021-01-01
Family Practice
Abstract:Dear Sir/Madam, We thank Xiao et al. for their attention to China’s health care system and graded diagnosis and treatment system (GDTS) (1), as well as for their comments on our article ‘General practitioners’ perspectives of the integrated health care system: a cross-sectional study in Wuhan, China’ (2). As general practitioners (GPs), Xiao et al. thoroughly discussed the challenges and corresponding solutions for community-first diagnosis, two-way referrals and up-and-down linkages of China’s GDTS, while our previous research mainly focussed on the perceptions and opinions of GPs on the integrated health care system and their impact on the GDTS. The main purpose of the integrated health care system is to optimize the distribution of medical resources and improve the capacity of primary medical services, which is regarded by the government of China as an effective way to implement the GDTS. Xiao et al. discussed the development status, existing problems and related advice for GDTS in China’s medical reform, but they failed to mention the influence of integrated health care systems on the formation of GDTS. On the basis of an integrated health care system practice and referable foreign experience, we now discuss the keys to facilitating the implementation of GDTS through an integrated health care system.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?