Diagnosis and Management of Pancreaticopleural Fistula in Children

Yanping Yu,Yunfeng Fu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/mpg.0000000000002481

2019-01-01

Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition

Abstract:To the Editor: Pancreaticopleural fistula (PPF) in children is rare but serious (1). Prompt recognition and proper treatment of a PPF is very important. Here, we summarized the diagnosis and management of PPF in children based on 9 cases from 7 English literatures (2–8). Table 1 summarizes the included cases. Almost all children presented with respiratory symptoms including dyspnea and cough. X-ray confirmed that all children had large pleural effusion. Since chest symptoms predominate, diagnosis of PPF is challenging. The key to diagnosis of PPF is a dramatically elevated pleural fluid amylase. But, there is no established cutoff value. Amylase in pleural effusion ranged from 950 to 157,000 IU/L, about 10 times higher than that in serum, as shown in Table 1.TABLE 1: Reported cases of pancreaticopleural fistulas in children over the last 30 yearsOnce PPF is suspected, detailed imaging is required to confirm the diagnosis. According data in adults, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is superior to both computed tomography (CT) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in delineating a fistula (1). The sensitivity of CT, ERCP, and MRCP in detecting pediatric PPF is, however, 50% (4/8), 60% (3/5), and 50% (1/2), respectively. Conservative treatment consisting of thoracic drainage, somatostatin analogs, and parenteral nutrition should be the first option for PPF (1). If unsuccessful, invasive procedures such as endoscopic or operative treatment are necessary. The majority of children (7/9) received enough time of conservative therapy. Of them, 3 (42.9%) children recovered with noninvasive therapy alone (3,6,7). Additional 3 and 1 children underwent successful surgery and ERCP procedure as first-line invasive intervention after failing conservative management, respectively. The other 2 patients underwent surgery directly as an initial management (5,6). Surgery is now seen as a treatment of last resort, used only after failure of medical and endoscopic therapy (1). In summary, the possibility of PPF should be considered in the differential diagnosis of massive pleural effusion in children. The key to diagnosis of PPF is a dramatically elevated pleural fluid amylase, and MRCP is superior to both CT and ERCP in confirming a fistula. An initial conservative management is recommended, whereas therapeutic ERCP is preferred and surgery is the last resort if conservative approach fails.