Letter by Ke and Shen Regarding Article, "Long-Term Association of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol with Cardiovascular Mortality in Individuals at Low 10-Year Risk of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: Results from the Cooper Center Longitudinal Study".

Chaofu Ke,Yueping Shen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.118.038328
IF: 37.8
2019-01-01
Circulation
Abstract:Circulation. 2019;139:2190–2191. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038328 2190 Chaofu Ke, PhD Yueping Shen, PhD To the Editor: We read with great interest the work by Abdullah et al,1 in which the authors examined the long-term association of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) with cardiovascular disease mortality in a low 10-year risk cohort. According to the results, LDL-C≥160 mg/dL was correlated with increased cardiovascular disease mortality, thus supporting consideration of new LDL-C thresholds for lipid-lowering interventions in low-risk individuals. We appreciate the authors’ contribution to an inadequately studied field, but 1 important issue has not been fully addressed by the authors. In the article, hazard ratios of all-cause mortality were calculated for different categories of LDL-C. The results clearly showed that these attenuated hazard ratios were not significant or marginally significant in univariable Cox analyses. Most importantly, results of multivariable Cox analyses were not provided. As indicated in the baseline characteristics given in Table 1, many influential factors of all-cause mortality (eg, sex, age, hypertension, body mass index, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol) were largely unbalanced between the reference group and the higher LDL-C groups. All of these factors are prone to result in higher all-cause mortalities in the higher LDL-C groups compared with the reference group. After adjustment of these potential confounders, the minimal positive associations of LDL-C with all-cause mortality might vanish or even be reversed. Although this article focused on cardiovascular disease mortality, the ultimate benefit of LDL-C lowering is not justified if elevated LDL-C did not contribute to increased all-cause mortality. This issue should be treated seriously because in a systematic review of 30 cohorts with 68 094 elderly people (≥60 years of age), an inverse association between LDL-C and all-cause mortality was seen in 16 cohorts representing 92% of subjects, and none of the other cohorts found a positive association between LDL-C and all-cause mortality.2 Moreover, statin treatment, the most widely used LDL-C lowering therapy, has been proven to account for a variety of adverse effects such as diabetes mellitus3 and myalgia.4 Therefore, more rigorous analyses and interpretations of the associations of LDL-C with non–cardiovascular disease mortality and all-cause mortality are essential before drawing conclusions about the clinical implications of LDL-C.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?