The Myocardial Response to Adrenomedullin Involves Increased Camp Generation As Well As Augmented Akt Phosphorylation

Chun Pan,Jin Shao,Chang Qi Cao,Jing Zhao,Jing Zhang,Xian Wang,Chao Tang,Yong Qi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2007.01.011
IF: 3.867
2007-01-01
Peptides
Abstract:In this work we aimed to observe (1) the changes in adrenomedullin (AM) and its receptor system – calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CRLR) and receptor activity modifying proteins (RAMPs) – in myocardial ischemic injury and (2) the response of injuried myocardia to AM and the phosphorylation of Akt to illustrate the protective mechanism of AM in ischemic myocardia. Male SD rats were subcutaneously injected with isoproterenol (ISO) to induce myocardial ischemia. The mRNA levels of AM, CRLR, RAMP1, RAMP2 and RAMP3 were determined by RT-PCR. Protein levels of Akt, phosphor-Akt, CRLR, RAMP1, RAMP2 and RAMP3 were assayed by Western blot. Results showed that, compared with that of the controls, ISO-treated rats showed lower cardiac function and myocardial injury. The mRNA relative amount of AM, CRLR, RAMP1, RAMP2 and RAMP3 in the myocardia of ISO-treated rats was increased. The elevated mRNA levels of CRLR, RAMP1, RAMP2 and RAMP3 were positively correlated with AM content in injured myocardia. The protein levels of CRLR, RAMP1, RAMP2 and RAMP3 in injured myocardia were increased compared with that of control myocardia. AM-stimulated cAMP generation in myocardia was elevated in the ISO group, and was antagonized by AM22–52 and CGRP8–37. Western blot analyses revealed that AM significantly enhanced Akt phosphorylation in injured myocardia, which was blocked by pretreatment with AM22–52 or CGRP8–37. Ischemia-injured myocardia hyper-expressed AM and its receptors – CRLR, RAMP1, RAMP2 and RAMP3 – and the response of ischemic myocardia to AM was potentiated, and the level of Akt phosphorylation was also increased, which suggests that changes in cardiac AM/AM receptor might play an important role in the pathogenesis of myocardial ischemic injury.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?