Abstract:The use of nanotechnologies involving nano- and microparticles has increased tremendously in the recent past. There are various beneficial characteristics that make particles attractive for a wide range of technologies. However, colloidal particles on the other hand can potentially be harmful for humans and environment. Today, complete understanding of the interaction of colloidal particles with biological systems still remains a challenge. Indeed, their uptake, effects, and final cell cycle including their life span fate and degradation in biological systems are not fully understood. This is mainly due to the complexity of multiple parameters which need to be taken in consideration to perform the nanosafety research. Therefore, we will provide an overview of the common denominators and ideas to achieve universal metrics to assess their safety. The review discusses aspects including how biological media could change the physicochemical properties of colloids, how colloids are endocytosed by cells, how to distinguish between internalized versus membrane-attached colloids, possible correlation of cellular uptake of colloids with their physicochemical properties, and how the colloidal stability of colloids may vary upon cell internalization. In conclusion three main statements are given. First, in typically exposure scenarios only part of the colloids associated with cells are internalized while a significant part remain outside cells attached to their membrane. For quantitative uptake studies false positive counts in the form of only adherent but not internalized colloids have to be avoided. pH sensitive fluorophores attached to the colloids, which can discriminate between acidic endosomal/lysosomal and neutral extracellular environment around colloids offer a possible solution. Second, the metrics selected for uptake studies is of utmost importance. Counting the internalized colloids by number or by volume may lead to significantly different results. Third, colloids may change their physicochemical properties along their life cycle, and appropriate characterization is required during the different stages.

Nanoparticle Dosagea Nontrivial Task of Utmost Importance for Quantitative Nanosafety Research

Quantitative uptake of colloidal particles by cell cultures

Using a Rasch Model to Account for Guessing as a Source of Low Discrimination.

Towards understanding of nanoparticle–protein corona

Safety assessment of nanomaterials: Implications for nanomedicine

Pitfalls and Challenges in Nanotoxicology: A Case of Cobalt Ferrite (CoFe2O4) Nanocomposites

Concept of Assessing Nanoparticle Hazards Considering Nanoparticle Dosemetric and Chemical/biological Response Metrics.

Advanced in silico characterization of nanomaterials for nanoparticle toxicology

The Toxicity Phenomenon and the Related Occurrence in Metal and Metal Oxide Nanoparticles: A Brief Review From the Biomedical Perspective

Nanoparticle Interactions with Co-Existing Contaminants: Joint Toxicity, Bioaccumulation and Risk

Dependence of Nanoparticle Toxicity on Their Physical and Chemical Properties

Applying quantitative structure–activity relationship approaches to nanotoxicology: Current status and future potential

Toxicologic Concerns with Current Medical Nanoparticles

Systematic and mechanistic analysis of AuNP-induced nanotoxicity for risk assessment of nanomedicine

Nanotoxicology for safe and sustainable nanotechnology

Biophysical interaction, nanotoxicology evaluation, and biocompatibility and biosafety of metal nanoparticles

Nanometrics goes beyond the size: Assessment of nanoparticle concentration and encapsulation efficiency in nanocarriers

Critical evaluation of the potential of ICP-MS-based systems in toxicological studies of metallic nanoparticles

Nanotoxicity: The Dark Side of Nanoformulations

Nanotoxicity: A Growing Need for Study in the Endocrine System

Challenges of Biological Complexity in the Study of Nanotoxicology