Crystal Plasticity Modeling of the Dynamic Recrystallization of Two-Phase Titanium Alloys During Isothermal Processing

Hongwei Li,Cuiming Wu,He Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2013.05.001
IF: 8.5
2013-01-01
International Journal of Plasticity
Abstract:• A crystal plasticity model for synchronously accounting for DRX and thermomechanics of titanium. • Effects of dynamic recovery and DRX on dislocation density were considered simultaneously. • Repeated nucleation of the recrystallized grains was taken into accounted. A new crystal plasticity model was proposed for synchronously responding dynamic recrystallization (DRX) and thermomechanical behavior of wrought two-phase titanium alloys. Within the crystal plasticity framework, the theories for dislocation density evolution and DRX were introduced and modified. The shear strain rate of slip system calculated via crystal plasticity was employed to determine the dislocation density of a grain. Dislocation annihilation caused by dynamic recovery was incorporated. The evolution of the dislocation densities in the matrix grain (M-grain) and the recrystallized grain (R-grain) was considered individually, thus, repeated nucleation of the recrystallized grains was permitted. They were considered to take place once the dislocation density of a grain (M-grain or R-grain) reached a critical value. The equivalent dislocation density of the grains aggregate (R-grains and M-grain) was calculated via a volume-averaged approach using the recrystallized fraction. The recrystallized fraction was updated by accounting for the percentage of the grain boundary density of the unrecrystallized matrix. This model was coded as a VUMAT in ABAQUS/Explicit and embedded in the finite element method for the simulation of isothermal compression on a two-phase titanium alloy. The predictions of the model are in good agreement with experimental data of the IMI834 alloy. The synchronous coupling effects of thermal deformation responses and DRX are accounted for, which improves the accuracy of the simulation results, e.g., the maximal error of the predicted steady stress to experiment is 3.1%. Nucleation rate and R-grains growth are quantified under different deformation conditions. The former is far larger (more than 20 times) in the α + β region than that in the β region, and the latter is about 0.55∼0.75 times in the α + β region of that in the β region. The effects that intergranular non-uniform deformation due to grain orientations and interphase non-uniform deformation due to different properties do on DRX are quantified. Nucleation rate and the recrystallized fraction at phase interface are about 4 and 10 times, respectively, of those within the β phase. Nucleation rate at β -grain boundary seems uniform, while, the recrystallized fraction becomes more and more non-uniform with increasing deformation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?