Micro‐vesicles Derived from Bone Marrow Stem Cells Protect the Kidney Both in Vivo and in Vitro by Microrna‐dependent Repairing

Jun He,Yan Wang,Xiaoxing Lü,Bei Zhu,Xiaohua Pei,Jianzhong Wu,Weihong Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nep.12490
2015-01-01
Nephrology
Abstract:Aims Micro‐vesicles ( MVs ) from bone mesenchymal stem cells ( MSCs ) have been shown to contribute to the recovery of damaged kidney. The aims of the present study are to investigate the biological effects and repair mechanisms of MVs . Methods Micro‐vesicles were obtained from MSC supernatants. In vitro, the proximal tubular epithelial cells ( HK ‐2) were treated with transforming growth factor ( TGF ‐β1). The expressions of E ‐cadherin and α‐smooth muscle actin (α‐ SMA) were evaluated. In vitro, the mice were divided into: control, unilateral ureteral obstruction ( UUO ), UUO + MSC , and UUO + MV group. MVs and MSCs were injected after surgery. The mice were killed 7/14 days after surgery and handled for further tests. The micro‐ RNA expressions were labeled using the miRCURY Hy3/Hy5 Power labeling kit and hybridized on the miRCURY LNA A rray. Results In vitro, MV reversed transforming growth factor‐β1 ( TGF ‐β1)‐induced morphological changes, and firmed the expression of E‐cadherin and reduced the secretion of α‐ SMA in HK2 cells. In vivo, the level of blood urea nitrogen ( BUN ) in the MV and MSC group was lower than the UUO ( P < 0.01). The Scr level decreased after 7 days of MV treatment ( P < 0.05). Administration of MSC and MV reduced S cr level at day 14 ( P < 0.05). The level of serum UA decreased with MV administration (day 7,14, P < 0.01). Herein, a total of 503 expressed miRNAs were detected, of which, 266 were in MSC , including 237 in MVs . Conclusion Micro‐vesicles ( MVs ) protect kidneys both in vivo and vitro, and MVs are superior to MSCs in some respects. MVs can be a potential therapy in treatment of kidney diseases.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?