Abstract:Background Colonoscopy with computer-aided detection (CADe) has been shown in non-blinded trials to improve detection of colon polyps and adenomas by providing visual alarms during the procedure. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of a CADe system that avoids potential operational bias. Methods We did a double-blind randomised trial at the endoscopy centre in Caotang branch hospital of Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital in China. We enrolled consecutive patients (aged 18-75 years) presenting for diagnostic and screening colonoscopy. We excluded patients with a history of inflammatory bowel disease, colorectal cancer, or colorectal surgery or who had a contraindication for biopsy; we also excluded patients who had previously had an unsuccessful colonoscopy and who had a high suspicion for polyposis syndromes, inflammatory bowel disease, and colorectal cancer. We allocated patients (1:1) to colonoscopy with either the CADe system or a sham system. Randomisation was by computer-generated random number allocation. Patients and the endoscopist were unaware of the random assignment. To achieve masking, the output of the system was shown on a second monitor that was only visible to an observer who was responsible for reporting the alerts. The primary outcome was the adenoma detection rate (ADR), which is the proportion of individuals having a complete colonoscopy, from caecum to rectum, who had one or more adenomas detected. The primary analysis was per protocol. We also analysed characteristics of polyps and adenomas missed initially by endoscopists but detected by the CADe system. This trial is complete and is registered with http://www.chictrorg.cn , ChiCTR1800017675. Findings Between Sept 3, 2018, and Jan 11, 2019, 1046 patients were enrolled to the study, of whom 36 were excluded before randomisation, 508 were allocated colonoscopy with polyp detection using the CADe system, and 502 were allocated colonoscopy with the sham system. After further excluding patients who met exclusion criteria, 484 patients in the CADe group and 478 in the sham group were induded in analyses. The ADR was significantly greater in the CADe group than in the sham group, with 165 (34%) of 484 patients allocated to the CADe system having one or more adenomas detected versus 132 (28%) of 478 allocated to the sham system (odds ratio 1.36, 95% CI 1. 03-1. 79; p=0.030). No complications were reported among all colonoscopy procedures. Polyps initially missed by the endoscopist but identified by the CADe system were generally small in size, isochromatic, flat in shape, had an unclear boundary, were partly behind colon folds, and were on the edge of the visual field. Interpretation Polyps initially missed by the endoscopist had characteristics that are sometimes difficult for skilled endoscopists to recognise. Such polyps could be detected using a high-performance CADe system during colonoscopy. The effect of CADe during colonoscopy on the incidence of interval colorectal cancer should be investigated. Copyright (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Influence of Sedated Endoscopy on Colorectal Adenoma Detection Rate: A Multicenter Study

Sedation is Associated with Higher Polyp and Adenoma Detection Rates During Colonoscopy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

The Impact Of Sedation On Adenoma Detection Rate And Cecal Intubation Rate In Colonoscopy

Influence of Sedation on the Detection Rate of Early Cancer and Precancerous Lesions During Diagnostic Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopies: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Sedated Colonoscopy may not be Beneficial for Polyp/Adenoma Detection

Comparison of adenoma detection in different colorectal segments between deep-sedated and unsedated colonoscopy

Standard-definition White-light, High-definition White-light Versus Narrow-band Imaging Endoscopy for Detecting Colorectal Adenomas: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

The Effect of Computer‐Aided Device on Adenoma Detection Rate in Different Implement Scenarios: A Real‐World Study

Impact of preprocedure simethicone on adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: a multicenter, endoscopist-blinded randomized controlled trial.

Efficacy of Image-Enhanced Endoscopy for Colorectal Adenoma Detection: A Multicenter, Randomized Trial.

Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy under Propofol‐based Sedation for Early Gastric Cancer and Pre‐cancerous Lesions is Associated with Better Diagnostic Accuracy: a Retrospective Cohort Study in China

Impact of Moderate versus Deep Sedation and Trainee Participation on Adenoma Detection Rate-Analysis of a Veteran Population

The single-monitor trial: an embedded CADe system increased adenoma detection during colonoscopy: a prospective randomized study

Lower Adenoma Miss Rate of Computer-aided Detection-Assisted Colonoscopy Vs Routine White-Light Colonoscopy in a Prospective Tandem Study.

Improved adenoma detection rate using a novel colonoscopic distal attachment: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Effect of an artificial intelligence-based quality improvement system on efficacy of a computer-aided detection system in colonoscopy: a four-group parallel study

S467 A Retrospective Study Examining the Impact of Computer-Aided Detection on Adenoma Detection Rate Amongst Non-Gastroenterology Endoscopists in a Rural Medical Center

Adenoma detection rate by colonoscopy in real-world population-based studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Adenoma Detection Rate is Not Influenced by the Time of Day in Computer-Aided Detection Colonoscopy

Effect of a deep-learning computer-aided detection system on adenoma detection during colonoscopy (CADe-DB trial): a double-blind randomised study.

An artificial intelligence-based quality improvement system significantly improved the efficacy of computer-aided detection system in colonoscopy: A four group parallel study