Abstract:Copyrighted works are greatly entwined with the concept of the sharing economy because of their status as informational public goods. Unlike commercial sharing models that address tangible goods such as bikes and houses, the sharing of which is limited by their physical nature, sharing models for intangible copyrighted works such as Google Books and live game webcasting must account for the comparatively unfettered ability for these to be shared. Accordingly, these models are more focused on exploiting such works to their full commercial potential. However, these sharing models are to a large extent based on the unauthorised exploitation of copyrighted works and will be unworkable if the related copyright issues cannot be solved. The interest that copyright owners have in exclusivity must thus be balanced with the public's interest in further exploitation of copyrighted works. Article 22 of the Copyright Law of China outlines an exhaustive list of copyright exceptions; such a restrictive list is incompatible with the sharing economy. The Chinese courts have realised this problem and have gone beyond the law in their judgments, taking a cue from their US counterparts. However, many of these decisions appear to be inconsistent with one another. To address the aforementioned problems, this paper examines the latest proposed amendment to the Copyright Law of China and proposes several legislative and judicial actions that could help promote the sharing economy. At the legislative level, enacting legislation based on a refined open-ended fair use model is necessary to promote the development of the sharing economy. At the judicial level, Chinese courts should employ the concept of transformative use to correctly interpret legislation based on the proposed open-ended model. With transformative use as the cornerstone of copyright policy, the public gains the freedom to share others’ works, participate in the innovation process, and create works with new value. Moreover, authors would retain an incentive to create works under such a legal regime because market substitution will not occur if a work is used for a different expressive purpose than that for which the work was originally created. Thus, a balance can be achieved between promoting the sharing economy and protecting the exclusivity of copyright in China.

Exploring the Protection of Copyright for Firework Performances

Live broadcasting of sporting events: a trigger to the revolutionary reform of Chinese copyright law by transforming the condition of originality

Legal Protection of Works of Applied Art

Study on Copyright Protection of Short Video Works

What Are Works? Copyright Law Subject Matter in the Transition to the Digital Era: Perspectives on the Third Amendment to the Chinese Copyright Act

An Analysis of Copyright Protection in Folk Music Works

The legal environment for copyright protection and trust management in China

Research on Copyright Protection of Film and TV Series in the Era of Short Video Deluge in China

More Is Less: A Critical Review Of Works Made For Hire Rules In China

The New Right Limitation and Exception Rules in Chinese Copyright Law

Battle between ‘Long’ and ‘Short’ Videos: Fragmented Uses, Diversified Purposes, and the Evolution of China’s Copyright Limitation Rules in the AI Era

Retrospect and Prospect of Copyright Protection for Computer Software in China

Parody and Fair Competition in the Network Society

The Study of Infringement Determination Standards for Music Work Cover Behavior—Taking Music Variety Shows as an Example

The Scope of Copyrightable Subject Matter in Computer Software: Also the Analysis and Implications of the American Judicial Experiences

Chinese High People’s Court Ruling Sheds Light on the Protection of Non-Conventional Works

The Intellectual Property Protection of Paper-cut Art in China

Why Not Further a Step for Better Legislation? Exploration and Evaluation of the Third Revision of the Copyright Law of China

Legal Protection for Folk Epics

To Share is Fair: the Changing Face of China's Fair Use Doctrine in the Sharing Economy and Beyond.

the Effect of Typical Cases Concerning Copyright Protection to Copyright Industries in China Under the background of Intellectual Property Powerhouse