Seizures and Epilepsy Following Cranioplasty

Jibo Zhang,Jincao Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2019.04.004

IF: 3.414

2019-01-01

Seizure

Abstract:We read with great interest the study by Shih et al [[1]Shih F.Y. Lin C.C. Wang H.C. et al.Risk factors for seizures after cranioplasty.Seizure. 2019; 66: 15-21Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (12) Google Scholar] regarding the risk factors for seizures after cranioplasty. The article is well written and the authors have concluded that delayed cranioplasty procedures and seizures before cranioplasty were significantly associated with early post-cranioplasty seizures. We really appreciate the interesting research for their conclusion would believe it to be useful to make a treatment decision and prevent seizures in advance in cranioplasty patients. However, after reading this article, we would like to highlight 2 important questions that it raises. Firstly, in their study, seizures (73/238, 30.3%) were the most common complication after cranioplasty. From most previous studies, it seems that post-operative infection is the most common complication. In fact, many people, including us, may confuse seizures and epilepsy. Epilepsy is a group of neurological disorders characterized by epileptic seizures. Epilepsy is when the patient has recurrent seizures due to an underlying disease of the brain. A person may have only one seizure in their whole life. But a person has epilepsy when he or she has seizures more than once. Seizures are signs of epilepsy but not all seizure-like symptoms are due to epilepsy. In addition, we also reviewed the incidence of epilepsy after cranioplasty in previous articles and compared it with the study in Shih et al [[1]Shih F.Y. Lin C.C. Wang H.C. et al.Risk factors for seizures after cranioplasty.Seizure. 2019; 66: 15-21Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (12) Google Scholar]. Malcolm et al [[2]Malcolm J.G. Rindler R.S. Chu J.K. Grossberg J.A. Pradilla G. Ahmad F.U. Complications following cranioplasty and relationship to timing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Clin Neurosci. 2016; 33: 39-51Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (101) Google Scholar] reported a systematic review and meta-analysis with 25 articles and 3126 patients, they found that the incidence of epilepsy was only 6.1% (n = 39/643), which was also significantly lower than the infection rate and bone resorption rate. Zanaty et al [[3]Zanaty M. Chalouhi N. Starke R.M. et al.Complications following cranioplasty: incidence and predictors in 348 cases.J Neurosurg. 2015; 123: 182-188Crossref PubMed Scopus (154) Google Scholar] reported a retrospective study with 12 years and 348 patients, they found that the infection rate (26.43%) was also significantly higher than that of epilepsy(14.37%). In a 10.75-year and 754 patients’ study, Morton et al [[4]Morton R.P. Abecassis I.J. Hanson J.F. et al.Timing of cranioplasty: a 10.75-year single-center analysis of 754 patients.J Neurosurg. 2018; 128: 1648-1652Crossref PubMed Scopus (64) Google Scholar] found the incidence of epilepsy was 4.1%, which was also lower than complications such as infection and hydrocephalus. We certify that we have no affiliations with any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.