Abstract:The significant and rapidly growing impact that digital technologies has on all aspects of our lives has raised awareness of benefits but also concerns and worries linked to the development and use of these technologies. The concept of responsibility, as expressed in terms such as corporate social responsibility or responsible research and innovation, represents one well-established discourse and a set of practices that are used to deal with social and ethical concerns and which are now a well-established part of the broader sustainability literature. Recently, a novel discourse has gained prominence that specifically explores the question of which responsibilities arise for organisations based on their engagement with digital technologies. This discourse uses the term 'corporate digital responsibility' to describe how organisations can understand, shape, and discharge their responsibilities not just in a narrow economic sense, but also their broader moral, social and environmental responsibilities. This article takes its point of departure from the corporate digital responsibility discussion and aims to contribute to the theoretical underpinnings of the term. This article suggests that an appropriate metaphor to approach the reality of current socio-technical systems is that of an "ecosystem". This metaphor accommodates many of the systems features of contemporary digital technologies, but it clashes with traditional conceptions of responsibility. This article argues that a concept of responsible digital ecosystems is a precondition for the successful ascription of responsibilities in digital contexts. Such ecosystems can be understood as systems that are designed to foster and support existing and novel responsibilities, that align responsibility ascriptions with a view to achieve desirable and acceptable outcomes. Based on these ideas of responsible digital ecosystems, this article spells out some of the implications for research and practice that the adoption of this conceptual framework entails.

How Can an Ethics of Responsibility for the Techological Age Be Possible——On the Principles of Responsibility of Hans Jonas and Its Practice

Technology and Responsibility Transcends the Anthropocentrism and Non-anthropocentrism——A Reading of Jonas' the Imperative of Responsibility:In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age

On the contemporary transformation of traditional theodicy—from Augustine's traditional theodicy to the philosophy of responsibility in Hans Jonas

Responsibility and the Ethics of Ecological Restoration

Ethics of Technology and Engineers’ Professional Ethics

How to Live a Life of One’s Own: Heidegger, Marcuse and Jonas on Technology and Alienation

Technological Ethics and Engineers’Professional Ethics

The Naturalistic Basis of Environmental Ethics

Technological Ethics in terms of the Frame of System of Soci-Technology——On G. Ropohl' Functional Outlook of Ethics of Technology

Future-oriented responsibility: The path and suggestion of promoting ethical governance of science and technology

From Corporate Digital Responsibility to Responsible Digital Ecosystems

Responsible AI and moral responsibility: a common appreciation

The Scientific Turn of Humanities Studies

Embedding responsibility in intelligent systems: from AI ethics to responsible AI ecosystems

On Problems of Ethical Land Use

Technology,Interest and Responsibility Ethics——Three Basic Dimensions of Engineering Ethics

An agenda for ontological cybernetics and social responsibility

Responsible (use of) AI

Science and Technology Revolution and Ethical Relation Between Human and Nature

How Can I Become a Responsible Subject? Towards a Practice-Based Ethics of Responsiveness

Role of Ethics in Nature-Human Relationship: a Pragmatic Inquiry