Bioequivalence Evaluation of 2 Tablet Formulations of Entecavir in Healthy Chinese Volunteers: A Single-Dose, Randomized-Sequence, Open-Label Crossover Study

Jiaqi Jin,J. Liu,J. Chen,Lizi Zhao,Zhenzhen Ma,X. Chen,Ming Huang,Guoping Zhong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1297964
2012-01-01
Abstract:A randomized, 2-way crossover study was conducted in healthy Chinese male volunteers to evaluate the bioequivalence of a new generic formulation of entecavir (CAS 142217-69-4) tablets (test) and the available branded formulation (reference) to meet the requirements for marketing the test product in China. Test and reference tablets were administered as a single dose on 2 treatment days separated by a 2-week washout period. Blood samples were collected for a period of 24 h following drug administration. Plasma concentration of entecavir was determined by a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using a noncompartmental model. Bioequivalence was determined by calculating 90% CIs for the ratios of Cmax, AUC0–t and AUC0–∞ values for the test and reference products. Tolerability was assessed by monitoring vital signs, laboratory tests and interviews with the volunteers before administration and every 2 h during the study. The 90% CIs of entecavir for Cmax, AUC0–t and AUC0–∞ were 95.2–106.9%, 98.4–104.6% and 97.3–104.4%, respectively, which fell within the interval of 80–125%. No clinically important adverse effects were reported. These results suggested that the test formulation of entecavir tablets met the regulatory criterion for bioequivalence to the reference formulation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?