Review of the New Textbook Series in Modern Political Economics
Yanis Varoufakis,Joseph Halevi,Nicholas Theocarakis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.6.1.0148
2015-01-01
World Review of Political Economy
Abstract:REVIEW OF THE NEW TEXTBOOK SERIES IN MODERN POLITICAL ECONOMICSNew Textbook Series in Modern Political Economics, edited by Enfu cheng et al.:1. Modern Political Economics, 2nd ed., edited by Enfu Cheng, Jinhua Feng, and Yan Ma, Shanghai, Shanghai University of Finance & Economics Press, 2012, x + 589 pp., 60 (paperback), ISBN 97875642126672. Intermediate Modern Political Economics, 1st ed., edited by Enfu Cheng, Bin Yu, Yan Ma, Leming Hu, and Ganqiang He, Shanghai, Shanghai University of Finance & Economics Press, 2012, VII + 690 pp., 88 (paperback), ISBN 97875642147393. Advanced Modern Political Economics, 1st ed., edited by Enfu Cheng and Yan Ma, Shanghai, Shanghai University of Finance & Economics Press, 2012, x + 692 pp., 95 (paperback), ISBN 9787564214722Steve cohn, an American heterodox economist, has been researching competing economic paradigms in china. He argues that neoclassical economics has replaced marxist economics as the dominant economic paradigm in china (cohn 2011). Here "neoclassical economics," in its broadest sense, refers to mainstream economics in the West.Cohn's argument has been confirmed by Haiping Qiu, a marxist economist at renmin University of china in Beijing. According to Qiu (2014), economics education and research in china have been westernizing gradually since the mid-1990s. In fact, Western economics, especially Western mainstream economics, now has dethroned marxist economics as the dominant economic methodology in china, marginalizing marxist economics severely.Of course, there are many complicated domestic and international factors behind the shift. But one direct factor, I think, may be textbooks. cohn (2011) mentions,Some of the Marxist economists I interviewed criticized their Marxist colleagues for failing to innovate or update Marxist thinking. They lamented the lack of attention to mathematical techniques and the continued use of old textbooks. They implied that this gave students the impression that Marxism was dated and had been superseded by more modern theories.The publication of the New textbook Series in modern Political Economics (hereinafter referred to as "the Series"), edited by Enfu cheng et al., in 2012, may be the first meaningful attempt to change the situation. Enfu cheng is a marxist economist at the chinese Academy of Social Sciences in Beijing. As cohn (2011) observed, "While retaining a fairly orthodox viewpoint, Professor cheng has tried to open marxist discourse in china to interactions with other heterodox paradigms. He has also tried to welcome more mathematical analysis alongside qualitative analysis." this point has also been incarnated in the Series, especially in Advanced Modern Political Economics (hereinafter referred to as "the textbook"), which was designed basically for doctoral students in chinese universities. the other two books of the Series, Modern Political Economics and Intermediate Modern Political Economics, are basically for undergraduates and for master's degree students, respectively.While retaining an orthodox viewpoint and discourse of classical marxism, the textbook gives a fairly large space to an introduction of relevant economic theories of various schools of marxism (most of which were labeled as "revisionism," a pejorative term, in chinese academia for decades after 1949) and other heterodox schools. these schools of thought include leninism, trotskyism, Western marxism, Post-Keynesian Economics, Neo-ricardianism, Japanese marxian mathematical Economics, Neo-marxian Economics, and Analytical marxism, among others. the textbook also gives enough space to comments on and/or counterarguments against these theories.The textbook implies that some concepts or principles in classical marxism, where necessary, could be improved or even revised. for example, the "New Presumption about Value-creating living labor," one of what the textbook calls the "four theoretical Presumptions in modern marxist Political Economics," given at the very beginning of the book, is that the productive labor, which creates value, not only includes labor that produces material commodities, which marx expounded, and labor that displaces tangible or intangible commodities, which marx basically expounded, but also includes labor that produces tangible or intangible cultural commodities, labor that provides services for production and reproduction of labor commodities, and managerial activities undertaken by owners of private, productive enterprises (cheng and ma 2012, 4-5). …