Complete Mesogastric Excision for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: Safety and Efficacy Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial
Daxing Xie,Jie Shen,Liang Liu,Beibei Cao,Yatao Wang,Jichao Qin,Jianhong Wu,Qun Yan,Yuanlong Hu,Chuanyong Yang,Zixin Cao,Junbo Hu,Ping Yin,Jianping Gong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3646563
2020-01-01
Abstract:Background: Implementation of complete mesogastric excision in gastric cancer surgery, named D2 lymphadenectomy plus complete mesogastric excision (D2+CME), has been recently proposed as an optimal procedure. However, the safety and efficacy of D2+CME remain uncertain. Methods: A prospective, randomized, parallel-controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary referral teaching hospital. Participants were randomized to undergo either D2+CME or conventional D2 procedure. Results: 338 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis, which comprised 169 patients (102 men and 67 women; mean [SD] age, 54•8 [9•5] years) in D2+CME group and 169 patients (111 men and 58 women; mean [SD] age, 54•5 [9•3] years) in D2 group. Patients in D2+CME group showed less intraoperative blood loss (median [IQR]; 15 • 0 [23 • 0] ml in D2+CME vs. 37 • 0 [33 • 5] ml in D2, p<0 • 0001), more lymph node harvesting (median [IQR]; 34 [16] lymph nodes in D2+CME vs. 27 [13] lymph nodes in D2, p<0•0001) and earlier postoperative flatus (p=0•009) than those in D2 group. The overall postoperative complication rate was comparable between two groups (20•1% in D2+CME vs. 16•0% in D2, p=0•322), however, patients in D2+CME group were less likely to have severe complications (Clavien-Dindo Classification grade ≥IIIa: 4 in D2+CME vs. 9 in D2, p=0•041). Conclusion: D2+CME is associated with better short-term outcomes and surgical safety than conventional D2 dissection for patients with advanced gastric cancer. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT01978444