Streptamer Versus Tetramer-Based Selection of Functional Cytomegalovirus-Specific T Cells.

Xinchao Wang,Peng Hua,Xun Xu,Anita Schmitt,Mathias Freund,Michael Schmitt,Baoan Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2012.02.020
IF: 3.871
2013-01-01
Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
Abstract:Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease constitutes a serious complication after stem cell transplantation and has been treated by adoptive transfer of donor-derived CMV-specific CD8(+) T cells. CMV-specific CD8(+) T cells were selected by multimers, and the technologies may alter the function of these T cells. Therefore, here we evaluated the impact of multimer reagents on the function of CD8(+) T lymphocytes.CMV-specific CD8(+) T cells were purified from the peripheral blood of donors using tetra- and streptamer technologies. The functional status of purified CMV-specific CD8(+) T cells was assessed by multiparametric immunophenotyping and carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester proliferation assays as well as by enzyme-linked immunospot assays.A similar percentage of CMV-specific CD8(+) T cells could be purified by both tetra- (90%) and streptamer (92%) technologies. That constitutes a 30- to 50-fold concentration of CMV-specific CD8(+)CD45RA(+)CCR7-effector T cells. Selected cells secreted interferon-gamma and granzyme B upon stimulation with CMVpp65 peptide, thus demonstrating their functionality.Our study demonstrated that both tetra- and streptamer technologies can be used to purify CMV-specific cytotoxic CD8(+) T cells for adoptive T-cell transfer. Both multimer technologies did not have any negative influence on the proliferation of selected T cells. Importantly, streptamer technology is available at good manufacturing practice level.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?