Clarification of the Role of Singlet Oxygen for Pollutant Abatement During Persulfate-Based Advanced Oxidation Processes: Co3O4@CNTs Activated Peroxymonosulfate As an Example.

Huijiao Wang,Lingwei Gao,Yuxin Xie,Gang Yu,Yujue Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2023.120480

IF: 12.8

2023-01-01

Water Research

Abstract:Singlet oxygen (O-1(2)) has often been identified by the popularly used quenching method as a more important reactive species (RS) than sulfate radicals (SO4 center dot-) and hydroxyl radicals ((OH)-O-center dot) for pollutant abatement during persulfate-based advanced oxidation processes (PS-AOPs), especially those activated by carbon-based catalysts. However, latest studies have demonstrated that the quenching method actually can often mislead the interpretations of the role of RS for pollutant abatement during AOPs due to various confounding effects caused by adding high-concentration quenchers in the system. To clarify the role of O-1(2) in PS-AOPs, this study developed a probe compound-based experimental and kinetic model to quantify the concentrations and exposures of O-1(2), SO4 center dot-, and (OH)-O-center dot, as well as their relative contributions to pollutant abatement during a cobalt oxide incorporated carbon nanotubes activated peroxymonosulfate (Co3O4@CNTs/PMS) process. Results show that during the Co3O4@CNTs/PMS process, the exposures and transient concentrations of O-1(2) were about 19.6 and 41.3 times higher than those of SO4 center dot- and (OH)-O-center dot, respectively. However, the relative contribution of O-1(2) to the abatement of most pollutants tested in this study (e.g., sulfisoxazole, sulfamethoxyprazine, trimethoprim, and metoprolol) is generally negligible (f(1O2) <= 8%) compared to that of SO4 center dot- and (OH)-O-center dot (f(SO4 center dot-) = 15%-98% and f(center dot OH) = 2%-78%) because of the significantly lower reactivity of O-1(2) with these compounds than that of SO4 center dot- and (OH)-O-center dot. Reasons for misidentifying O-1(2) as the dominant RS for pollutant abatement by the quenching method were then analyzed based on reaction kinetics principles. The results of this study highlight that while O-1(2) can be generated in significant amounts and be present at higher concentrations than SO4 center dot- and (OH)-O-center dot in PS-AOP systems, O-1(2) is unlikely to be the dominant RS for the abatement of most pollutants during the PS-AOPs because of its weak and selective oxidation capacity, and caution should be taken when using the quenching method to evaluate the role of RS for pollutant abatement by the PS-AOPs.