Abstract:Perceived supervisory support(PSS) describes employees' global view that supervisors value their contributions and care about their well-being.A large number of research illustrated significant relations between PSS and employees' positive responses to their organization.As for underlying reasons for the association,prior research used social exchange theory as framework,stating that employees normally viewed supervisors as representatives of the organization and generalized support from their supervisors to the organizations so that when receiving supervisory support,they are obligated to the organization.However,recent evidence has illustrated an important limit to this rationale in that employees might differ in the extent to which they view supervisors as organization's representatives.This stated,the effect of PSS on employees' responses to the organization is contingent on the extent to which employees perceive their supervisors as the organization.In spite of this,however,no consideration so far has been given to this possibility.In current study,we incorporated supervisor's organizational embodiment(SOE),a new concept,into social exchange framework to disentangle the boundary condition between PSS and employees' organizational citizenship behavior(OCB).SOE describes employees' perception concerning the extent of their supervisor's shared identity with the organization.We proposed that when SOE was high,employees perceived that the supervisor shared the organization's characteristics and the experience of support received from the supervisor as support from the organization;under this circumstance,employees were more likely to reciprocate to the organization with OCB when they received supervisory support.However when SOE was low,the supervisor was viewed as acting more on his or her behalf,and the support from the supervisor was taken as coming primarily from the supervisor rather than the organization;under this circumstance,the norm of social exchange would make employees respond to high PSS with OCB more toward the supervisor,and less toward the organization.We tested the hypothesis using a sample of 383 employees from various organizations.Established measures with high reliability and validity were used to capture the key variables.Hierarchical regression analysis was mainly conducted for data analyses.Consistent with previous findings,PSS was positively related to employees' OCB.More importantly,results demonstrated that SOE moderated the association of PSS with OCB such that PSS was more strongly related to OCB when SOE was higher.It was also found that SOE was a two dimensional construct and the two dimensions played different roles in moderating the association between PSS with OCB.Finally,it was also demonstrated that the moderating effect of SOE in the Chinese context might be weaker than that in the Western context.In conclusion,by rethinking the relationship between the supervisor and the organization,the study expanded previous study and contributed to the literature by investigating the moderating role of supervisor's organizational embodiment between PSS and employees' OCB,illustrating the boundary condition that supervisory support causes employees' beneficial responses to the organization.The study also shed light on the possible difference in the role of organizational embodiment within different cultural context.The study has also practical implication that organization should enhance supervisor's organizational embodiment to make supervisory support induce employees' positive responses to the organization.

Linking Perceived Supervisor Support for Strengths Use to Employee Strengths Use: the Perspective of Theory of Planned Behavior

Linking Colleague Support To Employees' Promotive Voice: A Moderated Mediation Model

Effects of Perceptions on LMX and Work Performance: Effects of Supervisors’ Perception of Subordinates’ Emotional Intelligence and Subordinates’ Perception of Trust in the Supervisor on LMX And, Consequently, Performance

Linking Supervisor Support to Innovation Implementation Behavior Via Commitment

Exploring the Relationship of Perceived Strengths-Based Human System with Knowledge Sharing

Does Supportive Human Resource Practice Make Employee Speak Without Reservation? Perspective of Behavioral Motivation

Employee Strengths Mindset and Voice Behavior: The Roles of General Self-Efficacy and Leader–Member Exchange

Employee Strengths Use and Turnover Intention: The Roles of Job Crafting and Self-Efficacy

Linking Perceived Organizational Support with Employee Work Outcomes in a Chinese Context: Organizational Identification As a Mediator

Organizational support and employee thriving at work: exploring the underlying mechanisms

Paying Close Attention to Strengths Mindset: the Relationship of Employee Strengths Mindset with Job Performance

How and when Do Strengths Work? the Effect of Strengths-Based Leadership on Follower Career Satisfaction

Can Core Self-Evaluations Promote Employee Strengths Use?

Bidirectional Work–Family Enrichment Mediates The Relationship Between Family-Supportive Supervisor Behaviors and Work Engagement

Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention.

The Effect of Strengths-Based Performance Appraisal on Perceived Supervisor Support and the Motivation to Improve Performance

The dark side of strengths-based approach in the workplace: Perceived strengths-based human resource system spurs unethical pro-organizational behavior

Do Organizations Benefit when Employees Receive Supervisory Support?The Moderating Role of Supervisors' Organizational Embodiment

Employee Strengths Use and Innovative Behavior: a Moderated Mediation Model

Professional Commitment Matters! Linking Employee Strengths Use to Organizational Citizenship Behavior

Strengths-Based Leadership and Turnover Intention: the Roles of Felt Obligation for Constructive Change and Job Control