Abstract:SIAM Journal on Computing, Volume 53, Issue 5, Page 1578-1601, October 2024. We show that for any natural number [math], there is a constant [math] and a subgraph-closed class having, for any natural [math], at most [math] graphs on [math] vertices up to isomorphism, but no adjacency labeling scheme with labels of size at most [math]. In other words, for every [math], there is a small—even tiny—monotone class without universal graphs of size [math]. Prior to this result, it was not excluded that every small class has an almost linear universal graph, or equivalently a labeling scheme with labels of size [math]. The existence of such a labeling scheme, a scaled-down version of the recently disproved Implicit Graph Conjecture, was repeatedly raised [Gavoille and Labourel, Proceedings of the 15th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms, Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci. 4698, Springer, 2007, pp. 582–593; Dujmović et al., J. ACM, 68 (2021), pp. 1–33; Bonamy, Gavoille, and Pilipczuk, SIAM J. Discrete Math., 36 (2022), pp. 2082–2099; Bonnet et al., Comb. Theory, 2 (2022)]. Furthermore, our small monotone classes have unbounded twin-width and thus simultaneously disprove the already-refuted Small conjecture, but this time with a self-contained proof, not relying on elaborate group-theoretic constructions. As our main ingredient, we show that with high probability an Erdős–Rényi random graph [math] with [math] has, for every [math], at most [math] subgraphs on [math] vertices, up to isomorphism. As a barrier to our general method of producing even more complex tiny classes, we show that when [math], the latter no longer holds. More concretely, we provide an explicit lower bound on the number of unlabeled [math]-vertex induced subgraphs of [math] when [math]. We thereby obtain a threshold for the property of having exponentially many unlabeled induced subgraphs: if [math] with [math], then with high probability even the number of all unlabeled (not necessarily induced) subgraphs is [math], whereas if [math] for sufficiently large [math], then with high probability the number of unlabeled induced subgraphs is [math]. This result supplements the study of counting unlabeled induced subgraphs that was initiated by Erdős and Rényi with a question on the number of unlabeled induced subgraphs of Ramsey graphs, eventually answered by Shelah.

L(2,1) -labeling for brick product graphs

L(2, 1)-labeling for brick product graphs.

$$L(2,1)$$L(2,1)-labeling for brick product graphs

-labeling for brick product graphs

L (3,2,1)-Labeling of Certain Planar Graphs

Optimal L(d,1)-Labeling of Certain Direct Graph Bundles Cycles over Cycles and Cartesian Graph Bundles Cycles over Cycles

The List L(2, 1)-Labeling of Planar Graphs

Optimal $L(2,1)$-labeling of certain strong graph bundles cycles over cycles

Optimal L(3,2,1)-labeling of trees

Optimal $L(d,1)$-labeling of certain direct graph bundles cycles over cycles and Cartesian graph bundles cycles over cycles

On L(2, 1)-labeling of zero-divisor graphs of finite commutative rings

L(2, 1)-labeling of some zero-divisor graphs associated with commutative rings

On L ( p , q ) -labelling of planar graphs without cycles of length four

Optimal Distance Labeling for Permutation Graphs

On local antimagic chromatic number of lexicographic product graphs

Distinguishing orthogonality graphs

Two product formulas for counting successive vertex orderings

List-Distinguishing Cartesian Products of Cliques

On the number of unlabeled vertices in edge-friendly labelings of graphs

Small but Unwieldy: A Lower Bound on Adjacency Labels for Small Classes

On The Number Of Labeled Bipartite Graphs