Abstract:Summary Background Staged laparoscopic management of intra-abdominal testes using pedicular section is recognized as gold standard technique, successful in 85 % of cases for scrotal testicular position with less than 10 % testicular atrophy. Recently, Shehata proposed a new technique without pedicular division for these testes, using spermatic vessels traction, but did not provide a comparative study of the two techniques. Objective To evaluate the laparoscopic spermatic pedicular traction (Shehata technique, ST) for the treatment of intra-abdominal testis, as an alternative to gold standard pedicular section (2-stage Fowler-Stephens, FS). Study design Intra-abdominal testes of 129 patients in two tertiary pediatric urology centers were managed laparoscopically (2011–2019) either by 2-stage FS orchidopexy or ST according to the surgeon preference. Testicular position and size were statistically compared. Results A total of 147 testes were pulled down by 80 ST and 67 FS, including 18 bilateral cases. Median (IQR) age at surgery was 24.2 (15.6–46.4) months (ST) and 18.3 (13.1–38.2) months (FS) (p = 0.094). Scrotal pulling-down of the testis was performed after a median (IQR) period of 2.3 (1.6–3.4) months (ST) and 6.1 (4.7–8.3) months (FS), respectively (p < 0.005). Although ST had collapsed in 17 cases (21.3 %), only one (1.3 %) redo procedure was required. After a median (IQR) follow-up of 22 (12–40) and 19 (8.75–37) months (p = 0.59), the testis was in the scrotum in 85 % and 81 % of ST and FS cases, respectively (p = 0.51). Testicular atrophy occurred in 10 % of ST and 13.4 % of FS (p = 0.61). Multivariate analysis using the propensity score analysis did not identify any difference between the two techniques. Discussion Our results seem to confirm that FS and ST achieve the same results regarding final testicular position and testicular atrophy rate, with a long-term follow-up. Our study supports pediatric surgeons to favor laparoscopic spermatic pedicular traction (ST) which preserves the testicular vascularization and may ensure better spermatogenesis after puberty. More details on the size and position of the testicle at the beginning of the first laparoscopy seem however essential to assess more accurately the outcomes of each surgical technique. Our outcomes will also be re-evaluated when our patients have reached puberty, from an exocrine and endocrine points of view. Conclusions This study showed similar results after laparoscopic traction or section of spermatic vessels for intra-abdominal testis in a long-term follow-up, providing more evidence for the use of ST as a valuable alternative to FS.

Laparoscopic Versus Open Orchiopexy for Non-Palpable Undescended Testes in Children: a Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

Transumbilical Multiport Laparoscopic Orchiopexy in Children: Comparison with Standard Laparoscopic Orchiopexy.

Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Open Resection in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: an Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Comparison of Single-Incision Scrotal Orchiopexy and Traditional Two-Incision Inguinal Orchiopexy for Primary Palpable Undescended Testis in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Laparoscopic vs open herniorrhaphy in the management of pediatric inguinal hernia: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Comparative Outcomes of Single-Stage versus Two-Stage Laparoscopic Fowler-Stephens Orchidopexy: A Systematic Review snd Meta-Analysis

Advantages of single-site laparoscopic orchiopexy for palpable undescended testes in children: a prospective comparison study

Laparoscopic Orchiopexy of Palpable Undescended Testes_ Experience of a Single Tertiary Institution with over 773 Cases

Laparoscopic Hernia Repair with the Extraperitoneal Approach versus Open Hernia Repair in Pediatric Inguinal Hernia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Laparoscopy-assisted orchiopexy for recurrent undescended testes in children.

A Clinical Comparative Study of Laparoscopy Versus Open Surgery in the Treatment of Neonates with Incarcerated Ovarian Hernia

Laparoscopic versus open orchiopexy in high inguinal undescended testes, randomized clinical trial

Reevaluation of laparoscopic surgery's value in pathological T4 colon cancer with comparison to open surgery: A retrospective and propensity score-matched study.

Laparoscopic Versus Open Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Efficacy and Safety Between Laparoscopic and Open Surgery of Pediatric Inguinal Hernia:A Meta-Analysis

Comparison of three different surgical approaches to children with cryptorchidism in differet locations

Comparison of Clinical Effect of Laparoscopic and Open Single-stage Fowler-Stephens Surgery ;for Pediatric Abdominal Cryptorchidism

Treatment of Pediatric Inguinal Hernia: Open Versus Laparoscopic Surgery

Clinical Effect of Laparoscopic Surgery on Children with Non-Abdominal Cryptorchidism

Staged laparoscopic orchiopexy of intra-abdominal testis: Spermatic vessels division versus traction? A multicentric comparative study

An Updated Meta-Analysis Of Laparoscopic Versus Open Pyeloplasty For Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction In Children