Determining the neutron skin types using deep learning and nuclear collisions: An attempt

Huang Yu-Jing,Pang Long-Gang,Wang Xin-Nian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1360/SSPMA-2021-0318
2022-01-01
Abstract:The distribution of neutrons inside the nucleus is essential for determining the neutron skin thickness, symmetry energy, equation of state of dense nuclear matter, and the mass-radius relationship of neutron stars. However, obtaining the neutron distribution is extremely challenging. Theoretically, the quantum many-body ab-initio calculations of heavy nucleus su ffer the curse of dimensionality. Experimentally, measuring neutrons is not as easy as protons because protons explicitly carry electric charges. Parity violating electron scattering experiment at Je fferson laboratory determines the neutron distribution through the weak charge distribution. We tried to extract the neutron distribution inside the nucleus from the final state hadrons of heavy ion collisions. In principle, the proton and neutron distributions inside the nucleus correspond to the initial state fluctuations and correlations. The initial state fluctuations are converted to correlations of the final state hadrons in momentum space. Mapping the final state to the initial state is the key to determining nuclear structure from heavy ion collision. We sampled 208Pb nucleons from halo-type, skin-type, and no-neutron-skin distributions and performed halo-halo, skin-skin, and noskin-noskin heavy-ion-collision simulations using the relativistic molecular dynamics program SMASH. Artificial intelligence and deep neural networks have powerful pattern recognition abilities, which can map data from two different domains. Using a point cloud network and convolutional neural network, we classified the neutron skin types using the initially sampled nuclei and final state hadrons after the collision. Because of the strong fluctuations from Monte Carlo sampling, the deep neural network only attained 62% prediction accuracy on the initial state. It failed to predict the neutron skin types using the final state hadrons. However, the network achieved a prediction accuracy of 37.47% on the 3-types classification, which was 4% higher than the random-guess accuracy of 33.3% with 30000 testing samples. This study shows that the network might not determine the neutron skin types from the final state hadrons. However, it can identify whether there is a neutron skin using the final state hadrons with non-zero probability. If ultraperipheral collisions are selected, the network can classify the halo-halo and skin-skin types with a testing accuracy of 56%, using the charge information and multi-event mixing method.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?