Abstract:The class of doubly robust (DR) functionals studied by Rotnitzky et al. (2021) is of central importance in economics and biostatistics. It strictly includes both (i) the class of mean-square continuous functionals that can be written as an expectation of an affine functional of a conditional expectation studied by Chernozhukov et al. (2022b) and the class of functionals studied by Robins et al. (2008). The present state-of-the-art estimators for DR functionals ψ are double-machine-learning (DML) estimators (Chernozhukov et al., 2018a). A DML estimator ψ̂1 of ψ depends on estimates p̂(x) and b̂(x) of a pair of nuisance functions p(x) and b(x) , and is said to satisfy "rate double-robustness" if the Cauchy–Schwarz upper bound of its bias is o(n−1/2) . Rate double-robustness implies that the bias is o(n−1/2) , but the converse is false. Were it achievable, our scientific goal would have been to construct valid, assumption-lean (i.e. no complexity-reducing assumptions on b or p ) tests of the validity of a nominal (1−α) Wald confidence interval (CI) centered at ψ̂1 . But this would require a test of the bias to be o(n−1/2) , which can be shown not to exist. We therefore adopt the less ambitious goal of falsifying, when possible, an analyst's justification for her claim that the reported (1−α) Wald CI is valid. In many instances, an analyst justifies her claim by imposing complexity-reducing assumptions on b and p to ensure "rate double-robustness". Here we exhibit valid, assumption-lean tests of H0 : "rate double-robustness holds", with non-trivial power against certain alternatives. If H0 is rejected, we will have falsified her justification. However, no assumption-lean test of H0 , including ours, can be a consistent test. Thus, the failure of our test to reject is not meaningful evidence in favor of H0 .

Wald, QLR, and Score Tests when Parameters Are Subject to Linear Inequality Constraints

Linear Regression Analysis with Inequality Constraints on the Regression Parameters Via Empirical Likelihood

Consistent Specification Testing Via Nonparametric Series Regression

A Loss Function Approach to Model Specification Testing and Its Relative Efficiency

On the E ffi ciency of Generalized Likelihood Ratio Tests

Inference for High-Dimensional Linear Expectile Regression with De-Biasing Method

Nonparametric Testing Of An Exclusion Restriction In Quantile Regression

Wald tests for variance-adjusted equivalence assessment with normal endpoints

A Note on Self-Weighted Quantile Estimation for Infinite Variance Quantile Autoregression Models

Testing many constraints in possibly irregular models using incomplete U -statistics

Testing linearity in partial functional linear quantile regression model based on regression rank scores

Inference for possibly misspecified generalized linear models with nonpolynomial-dimensional nuisance parameters

Testing generalized linear models with high-dimensional nuisance parameter.

Local power of the LR, Wald, score and gradient tests in dispersion models

Linear hypothesis testing in ultra high dimensional generalized linear mixed models

Tests for equality of several mean vector functions for multivariate functional data with applications

A Nonparametric Model Checking Test for Functional Linear Composite Quantile Regression Models

Log-Rank-Type Tests for Equality of Distributions in High-Dimensional Spaces.

Assumption-lean falsification tests of rate double-robustness of double-machine-learning estimators

Power Enhancement in High Dimensional Cross-Sectional Tests

A Joint Test for Parametric Specification and Independence in Nonlinear Regression Models