Abstract:Granger causality (GC) is one of the most popular measures to reveal causality influence of time series and has been widely applied in economics and neuroscience. Especially, its counterpart in frequency domain, spectral GC, as well as other Granger-like causality measures have recently been applied to study causal interactions between brain areas in different frequency ranges during cognitive and perceptual tasks. In this paper, we show that: 1) GC in time domain cannot correctly determine how strongly one time series influences the other when there is directional causality between two time series, and 2) spectral GC and other Granger-like causality measures have inherent shortcomings and/or limitations because of the use of the transfer function (or its inverse matrix) and partial information of the linear regression model. On the other hand, we propose two novel causality measures (in time and frequency domains) for the linear regression model, called new causality and new spectral causality, respectively, which are more reasonable and understandable than GC or Granger-like measures. Especially, from one simple example, we point out that, in time domain, both new causality and GC adopt the concept of proportion, but they are defined on two different equations where one equation (for GC) is only part of the other (for new causality), thus the new causality is a natural extension of GC and has a sound conceptual/theoretical basis, and GC is not the desired causal influence at all. By several examples, we confirm that new causality measures have distinct advantages over GC or Granger-like measures. Finally, we conduct event-related potential causality analysis for a subject with intracranial depth electrodes undergoing evaluation for epilepsy surgery, and show that, in the frequency domain, all measures reveal significant directional event-related causality, but the result from new spectral causality is consistent with event-related time-frequency power spectrum activity. The spectral GC as well as other Granger-like measures are shown to generate misleading results. The proposed new causality measures may have wide potential applications in economics and neuroscience.

Spectral Rank, Feedback, Causality and the Indirect Method for CARMA Identification

Spectral theory of fluctuations in time-average statistical mechanics of reversible and driven systems

Spectral Analysis in Linear Process Identification—a New Look at an Old Problem

Quantitative Error Analyses of Spectral Density Estimators Using Covariance Lags

A note on estimation of $α$-stable CARMA processes sampled at low frequencies

Dependence Estimation for High Frequency Sampled Multivariate CARMA Models

Identification of Low Rank Vector Processes

Non‐causal and non‐invertible ARMA models: Identification, estimation and application in equity portfolios

Analysis of Feedback Mechanisms with Unknown Delay Using Sparse Multivariate Autoregressive Method

Spectral Representation for Causal Estimation with Hidden Confounders

Adaptive Multi-Innovation Gradient Identification Algorithms for a Controlled Autoregressive Autoregressive Moving Average Model

Modeling and Identification of Low Rank Vector Processes

Spectral model of time-domain coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering

A spectral adjustment for spatial confounding

A spectral approach for the dynamic Bradley–Terry model

On the inference about the spectral distribution of high-dimensional covariance matrix based on high-frequency noisy observations

Generic Spectral Results for CMV Matrices with Dynamically Defined Verblunsky Coefficients

Causality analysis of neural connectivity: critical examination of existing methods and advances of new methods.

A method to assess Granger causality, isolation and autonomy in the time and frequency domains: theory and application to cerebrovascular variability

Spectral Methods for Data Science: A Statistical Perspective

On The Multivariate Circulant Rational Covariance Extension Problem