Abstract:Automatic grading is not a new approach but the need to adapt the latest technology to automatic grading has become very important. As the technology has rapidly became more powerful on scoring exams and essays, especially from the 1990s onwards, partially or wholly automated grading systems using computational methods have evolved and have become a major area of research. In particular, the demand of scoring of natural language responses has created a need for tools that can be applied to automatically grade these responses. In this paper, we focus on the concept of automatic grading of short answer questions such as are typical in the UK GCSE system, and providing useful feedback on their answers to students. We present experimental results on a dataset provided from the introductory computer science class in the University of North Texas. We first apply standard data mining techniques to the corpus of student answers for the purpose of measuring similarity between the student answers and the model answer. This is based on the number of common words. We then evaluate the relation between these similarities and marks awarded by scorers. We consider an approach that groups student answers into clusters. Each cluster would be awarded the same mark, and the same feedback given to each answer in a cluster. In this manner, we demonstrate that clusters indicate the groups of students who are awarded the same or the similar scores. Words in each cluster are compared to show that clusters are constructed based on how many and which words of the model answer have been used. The main novelty in this paper is that we design a model to predict marks based on the similarities between the student answers and the model answer. We argue that computational methods be used to enhance the reliability of human scoring, and not replace it. Humans are required to calibrate the system, and to deal with situations that are challenging. Computational methods can provide insight into which student answers will be found challenging and thus be a place human judgement is required.

A New Roadmap for Evaluating Descriptive Handwritten Answer Type

A Study of Automated Evaluation of Student’s Examination Paper using Machine Learning Techniques

Struck-Out Handwritten Word Detection and Restoration for Automatic Descriptive Answer Evaluation

Handwriting recognition and automatic scoring for descriptive answers in Japanese language tests

Can AI Assistance Aid in the Grading of Handwritten Answer Sheets?

Hard to Cheat: A Turing Test based on Answering Questions about Images

Automated Assessment of Multimodal Answer Sheets in the STEM domain

Anomaly Handwritten Text Detection for Automatic Descriptive Answer Evaluation.

AI-assisted Automated Short Answer Grading of Handwritten University Level Mathematics Exams

Evaluating GPT-4 at Grading Handwritten Solutions in Math Exams

Grading Assistance for a Handwritten Thermodynamics Exam using Artificial Intelligence: An Exploratory Study

An automated essay scoring systems: a systematic literature review

BAGS: An automatic homework grading system using the pictures taken by smart phones

Get It Scored Using AutoSAS -- An Automated System for Scoring Short Answers

Automatic short answer grading and feedback using text mining methods

A Machine Learning Approach for Automated Evaluation of Short Answers Using Text Similarity Based on WordNet Graphs

Machine Learning Techniques with Ontology for Subjective Answer Evaluation

Automated Content Grading Using Machine Learning

AI-assisted automated scoring of picture-cued writing tasks for language assessment

Automated Scoring of Graphical Open-Ended Responses Using Artificial Neural Networks

A Computer Aided Grading System for Subjective Tests