Clinical Characteristics of Chronic Drug-Induced Liver Injury in Mainland China: a Multicenter Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

Hong Zhao,Chengwei Chen,Yimin Mao,Wen Xie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-8278(23)00626-8
IF: 25.7
2023-01-01
Journal of Hepatology
Abstract:Objective:To investigate the prevalence, clinical characteristics, risk factors, and prognosis of chronic drug-induced liver injury (DILI).Methods:A multicenter, open, retrospective, non-interventional epidemiological survey was conducted. According to the inclusion criteria, patients with DILI and hospitalized in 308 hospitals in China from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014 were enrolled, and medical records of the patients were collected. The patients with DILI were divided into chronic and acute DILI groups. The clinical characteristics, laboratory tests, and prognosis in patients of the 2 groups were compared, and the suspected drugs that induced the liver injury were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the influencing factors of chronic DILI.Results:A total of 25 927 patients were enrolled in the study, including 22 556 (87%) with acute DILI (acute DILI group) and 3 371 (13%) with chronic DILI (chronic DILI group). In the chronic DILI group, there were high proportion of women and the patients were older in age; more patients were with a history of liver disease and the time from medication to DILI was longer; more patients had digestive system symptoms (including loss of appetite, abdominal distension, nausea, vomiting, etc.), fatigue, jaundice, pruritus, liver pain/discomfort, bleeding tendency; the alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, and international normalized ratio were higher, while the serum albumin and platelet counts were lower; the proportion of patients with model for end-stage liver disease score ≥ 15 was higher; the all-cause mortality rate and liver disease-related mortality rate were higher, compared with the acute DILI group. The differences above-mentioned were statistically significant (all P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that male was protective factor [odds ratio ( OR)=0.76, 95% confidence interval ( CI): 0.69-0.83], while previous liver disease history ( OR=2.00, 95% CI: 1.82-2.19) and hypoalbuminemia ( OR=0.96, 95% CI: 0.95-0.96) were independent risk factors for chronic DILI. Conclusions:In the study period, the proportion of chronic DILI among DILI inpatients is 13.0% in the 308 hospitals. Compared with those with acute DILI, more chronic DILI patients were female, and patients with chronic DILI have higher ages, severer conditions, and poorer prognoses; female, previous liver disease history, and hypoalbuminemia are independent risk factors for chronic DILI.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?