Simulation in surgery
J. Jakimowicz,Abe Fingerhut
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6616
2009-06-01
Abstract:Social, economic and technological change over the past 20 years, particularly in Europe and the USA, has occasioned some scrutiny of the apprenticeship system of training surgeons1. Although the importance of operative technical skills, an integral part of surgical competence, has always been widely acknowledged in the literature, little attention has hitherto been given to the way in which these skills might be brought to an optimum level of proficiency2. In the last decade of the 20th century the idea of using simulation surfaced, and at the dawn of the 21st century it has become apparent that there is no better solution to offset the problems of curtailed apprenticeship, and to train and assess technical skills1,2. This is particularly so because image-based procedures, such as minimal access surgery and flexible endoscopy, have become the backbone of modern surgery. Simulation technology has rapidly been accepted as a helpful tool in the development of specific surgical skills, allowing surgeons to cope with the often complex interfaces encountered during modern operative procedures. Of the different simulation modalities that are now available, low-cost bench models and box trainers are well suited for teaching basic skills. They can be applied to both imagebased procedures and open surgery. Such techniques, however, require assessment by an external observer and are rarely adaptable to complete operations. A recent example of their use may be found in the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery curriculum developed by the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. This curriculum is based on box trainers supported by an observer and a didactic CD-rom. It has been approved by the American College of Surgery and is now widely used for training in basic laparoscopic skills3. External observers are not always necessary when using so-called human performance simulators, which offer high-fidelity objective assessment, and are specifically suitable for resuscitation and trauma care. They allow the collection of training data and are interactive. Human performance simulators do, however, have some drawbacks. First, they are costly. Second, they are not suitable for teaching technical surgical skills. Finally, virtual reality (VR) simulation and augmented reality simulation are at present available only for image-based procedures4. Still, they can be used for component tasks and certain types of complete procedures; they are suitable for training in electrosurgery and ultrasonography. In addition, the data collection of VR simulation and augmented reality allows an objective, interactive assessment and the standardization of tasks. There remains, however, a need for further development of these costly techniques as most VR systems, with the exception of augmented reality, lack realistic haptic feedback. Moreover, both VR simulation and augmented reality could benefit from improved educational content as well as metrics and assessment protocols4. The use of both live animals and human cadavers is well accepted in surgical training, but they are expensive and require special facilities. These models lend themselves both to the practice of specific steps of an operation and to training in a complete procedure. This is so for both open and laparoscopic surgery. One problem, however, is that live animal and cadaveric work is not permitted in several countries; another is the, probably small, risk of infection. Finally, a simulated operating theatre offers the possibility of training in both technical as well as non-technical surgical skills, and can be used for advanced procedures in both open and laparoscopic surgery1. A simulated theatre, however, requires considerable manpower and is very costly. Artificial tissue models and simulators for the assessment of technical competency in open vascular surgery have recently been introduced and validated in the framework of the examination for vascular surgery by the European Board of Surgery Qualifications. Although this might encourage the expansion of this technology into other specialities5, the use of simulation in open surgery has not so far appealed much to trainees and educators. This is mainly due to the mediocre quality of artificial tissue models and the lack of VR simulators for open surgery. A comprehensive review of the use of VR simulators in endoluminal vascular surgery has underscored its usefulness6. Furthermore, a review of randomized controlled trials examining the difference between VR training and box training for laparoscopic surgery has shown that the former reduces the number of errors and increases performance. The time taken to complete the tasks decreased