Abstract:Background: Extremities fractures are a leading cause of death and disability, especially in the elderly. Avulsion fracture are also the most commonly missed diagnosis, and delayed diagnosis leads to higher litigation rates. Therefore, this study evaluates the diagnostic efficiency of the artificial intelligence (AI) model before and after optimization based on computed tomography (CT) images and then compares it with that of radiologists, especially for avulsion fractures.Methods: The digital X-ray photography [digital radiography (DR)] and CT images of adult limb trauma in our hospital from 2017 to 2020 were retrospectively collected, with or without 1 or more fractures of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, hand, hip, knee, ankle, and foot. Labeling of the fracture referred to the visualization of the fracture on the corresponding CT images. After training the pre-optimized AI model, the diagnostic performance of the pre-optimized AI, optimized AI model, and the initial radiological reports were evaluated. For the lesion level, the detection rate of avulsion and non-avulsion fractures was analyzed, whereas for the case level, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were compared among them.Results: The total datasets (1,035 cases) were divided into a training set (n=675), a validation set (n=169), and a test set (n=191) in a balanced joint distribution. At the lesion level, the detection rates of avulsion fracture (57.89% vs. 35.09%, P=0.004) and non-avulsion fracture (85.64% vs. 71.29%, P<0.001) by the optimized AI were significantly higher than that by pre-optimized AI. The average precision (AP) of the optimized AI model for all lesions was higher than that of pre-optimized AI model (0.582 vs. 0.425). The detection rate of avulsion fracture by the optimized AI model was significantly higher than that by radiologists (57.89% vs. 29.82%, P=0.002). For the non-avulsion fracture, there was no significant difference of detection rate between the optimized AI model and radiologists (P=0.853). At the case level, the accuracy (86.40% vs. 71.93%, P<0.001) and sensitivity (87.29% vs. 73.48%, P<0.001) of the optimized AI were significantly higher than those of the pre-optimized AI model. There was no statistical difference in accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity between the optimized AI model and the radiologists (P>0.05).Conclusions: The optimized AI model improves the diagnostic efficacy in detecting extremity fractures on radiographs, and the optimized AI model is significantly better than radiologists in detecting avulsion fractures, which may be helpful in the clinical practice of orthopedic emergency.

[Value of Artificial Intelligence in the Improvement of Diagnostic Consistency of Radiology Residents].

Clinical Evaluation of AI Software for Rib Fracture Detection and Its Impact on Junior Radiologist Performance

[Diagnosis of Rib Fracture Using Artificial Intelligence on Chest CT Images of Patients with Chest Trauma]

Improving Radiographic Fracture Recognition Performance and Efficiency Using Artificial Intelligence

Improving diagnostic performance of rib fractures for the night shift in radiology department using a computer-aided diagnosis system based on deep learning: A clinical retrospective study

AI-Assisted X-ray Fracture Detection in Residency Training: Evaluation in Pediatric and Adult Trauma Patients

Diagnostic accuracy and potential covariates of artificial intelligence for diagnosing orthopedic fractures: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Rib Fracture Detection System Based on Deep Learning.

Navigating the Spectrum: Assessing the Concordance of ML-Based AI Findings with Radiology in Chest X-Rays in Clinical Settings

Artificial intelligence in commercial fracture detection products: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy

Artificial intelligence to detect the femoral intertrochanteric fracture: The arrival of the intelligent-medicine era

Artificial intelligence diagnostic accuracy in fracture detection from plain radiographs and comparing it with clinicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Chest Radiographs Referred from the Emergency Department

Improving rib fracture detection accuracy and reading efficiency with deep learning-based detection software: a clinical evaluation

Comparison between artificial intelligence solution and radiologist for the detection of pelvic, hip and extremity fractures on radiographs in adult using CT as standard of reference

Diagnostic accuracy of a commercially available deep-learning algorithm in supine chest radiographs following trauma

Artificial intelligence versus radiologist in the accuracy of fracture detection based on computed tomography images: a multi-dimensional, multi-region analysis

Nonradiology Health Care Professionals Significantly Benefit From AI Assistance in Emergency-Related Chest Radiography Interpretation

Artificial intelligence in traumatology

The value of CT ribs unfolded algorithm in the diagnosis of rib fracture

Effectiveness of an Artificial Intelligence Software for Limb Radiographic Fracture Recognition in an Emergency Department