Comparative study of percutaneous double screwdriver minimally invasive reduction and limited open reduction in the treatment of irreducible femoral intertrochanteric fractures

马腾,黄强,许毅博,路遥,薛汉中,李忠,张堃
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2021.06.002
2021-01-01
Abstract:Objective:The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical effects of percutaneous double screwdriver minimally invasive reduction and limited open reduction in the treatment of irreducible femoral intertrochanteric fractures.Methods:From January 2016 to January 2018, a total of 145 patients with irreducible femoral intertrochanteric fractures were treated in Xi'an Honghui hospital. 128 patients received complete follow-up, of which 66 received percutaneous double screwdriver minimally invasive reduction (Group A) and 62 received limited open reduction (Group B) treatment. All patients were classified according to Evans-Jensen classification and fixed with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA). The operation indexes were observed, including incision length, bleeding volume, intraoperative fluoroscopy times and operation time. All patients were followed up for at least one year. The bone healing, complications and Harris score of hip joint were counted.Results:128 patients were completely followed up. The mean follow-up time was (19±4) months. There were 58 males and 70 females, with an average age of (66±14) years. The incision length of Group A and B were (8.4±1.4) cm and (15.3±3.0) cm, respectively. The bleeding volume was (151 ± 26) ml and (319 ± 33) ml. The times of intraoperative fluoroscopy were (14.1±2.9) and (8.2±1.7). The operation time was (44±9) min and (73±11) min, respectively. The fracture healing time was (55±12)d and (80±13)d. One year after operation, the Harris scores of Group A and B were (86 ± 4) and (82 ± 4), respectively. The excellent and good rates of Harris score were 92.4% and 88.7%. Percutaneous double screwdriver minimally invasive reduction group had shorter incision length, less bleeding, shorter fracture healing time and higher Harris score (P<0.05).Conclusions:The clinical effects of percutaneous double screwdriver minimally invasive reduction group was better than that of limited open reduction group. Percutaneous double screwdriver minimally invasive reduction technique can be used as the first choice for the reduction of irreducible femoral intertrochanteric fractures. It is worthy of clinical promotion.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?